(This is a parody for all who were unawere)

  • liyunxiao
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    If Biden was convicted of a high crime, absolutely. That’s only be constitutional.

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      So if the courts who are the actual constitutional check said Biden could run you would support Trump stopping him?

      • liyunxiao
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The courts aren’t the check in the case we’re talking about, the jury is.

        • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Im talking about SCOTUS and the federal courts. Those Courts are the check on the executive branch. The executive branch is not the check on itself.

          Even if we were talking about a jury that would still ge part of the courts

          • liyunxiao
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Neither scotus nor the federal courts can bring charges, only oversee trials for said charges, or in the case of scotus, determine whether laws are constitutional and were followed during trial.*

            Therefore the executive, as has always been it’s role would have to bring charges.

            • Obviously courts can bring contempt charges, but only during and after a trial.