This question was inspired by a post on lemmy.zip about lowering the minimum age to purchase firearms in the US, and a lot of commeters brought up military service and training as a benchmark to normal civilians, and how if guns would be prevalent, then firearm training should be more common.

For reference, I live in the USA, where the minimum age to join the military is 18, but joining is, for the most part, optional. I also know some friends that have gone through the military, mostly for college benefits, and it has really messed them up. However, I have also met some friends from south korea, where I understand military service is mandatory before starting a more normal career. From what I’ve heard, military service was treated more as a trade school, because they were never deployed, in comparison to American troops.

I just wanted to know what the broader Lemmy community thought about mandatory military service is, especially from viewpoints outside the US.

    • JohnDClay
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Taxation isn’t because there’s a middle man between your labor and the government?

      • Bobr@lemmy.libertarianfellowship.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Well, you raise a valid point, it’s also bad of course.
        It’s just that “forcing you to do a thing (a physical labor) you do not want to do” and “forcing you to give up a part of your salary” are different things.