The primary focus of this exchange is how the game’s story was a major factor in its poor sales performance.
I am asserting that the story significantly contributed to this lack of success, and I have provided sources to support this claim.
For further illustration, the game lacked meaningful moral choices and consequences, a defining feature of previous entries. Additionally, the gameplay was linear and unremarkable, with simplistic mechanics that failed to stand out.
I find it difficult to recall the exact point of our discussion, as you continue to introduce minutiae and nuance that, while relevant, stray from the core argument.
I have kept my points clear and concise, consistently attempting to keep the discussion focused on the central issue. However, much like Sean Hannity, you have managed to fill an entire comment section with excessive verbiage while ultimately saying very little.
I have no doubt that you will now argue this with an even longer response with more quotes for my comment but I don’t think I’m going to respond to it moving forward I’m going to let you have the last word. Sorry. I’m tired.
Again, the sources you provided did not back up these claims.
I find it difficult to recall the exact point of our discussion, as you continue to introduce minutiae and nuance that, while relevant, stray from the core argument.
So, let me get this straight: You asked me to elaborate on my assertions. When I did so, you then label that as an irrelevant digression.
Thanks, I guess.
I have kept my points clear and concise, consistently attempting to keep the discussion focused on the central issue.
I… don’t think that’s accurate.
However, much like Sean Hannity, you have managed to fill an entire comment section with excessive verbiage while ultimately saying very little.
Entirely your fault. I’ve done my best to cut down my replies, I can’t say the same about you.
I have no doubt that you will now argue this with an even longer response with more quotes for my comment but I don’t think I’m going to respond to it moving forward I’m going to let you have the last word. Sorry. I’m tired.
See, this is a prime example. 45 words that could have been left out entirely.
The primary focus of this exchange is how the game’s story was a major factor in its poor sales performance.
I am asserting that the story significantly contributed to this lack of success, and I have provided sources to support this claim.
For further illustration, the game lacked meaningful moral choices and consequences, a defining feature of previous entries. Additionally, the gameplay was linear and unremarkable, with simplistic mechanics that failed to stand out.
I find it difficult to recall the exact point of our discussion, as you continue to introduce minutiae and nuance that, while relevant, stray from the core argument.
I have kept my points clear and concise, consistently attempting to keep the discussion focused on the central issue. However, much like Sean Hannity, you have managed to fill an entire comment section with excessive verbiage while ultimately saying very little.
I have no doubt that you will now argue this with an even longer response with more quotes for my comment but I don’t think I’m going to respond to it moving forward I’m going to let you have the last word. Sorry. I’m tired.
Again, the sources you provided did not back up these claims.
So, let me get this straight: You asked me to elaborate on my assertions. When I did so, you then label that as an irrelevant digression.
Thanks, I guess.
I… don’t think that’s accurate.
Entirely your fault. I’ve done my best to cut down my replies, I can’t say the same about you.
See, this is a prime example. 45 words that could have been left out entirely.