DytallixB@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 天前White House Faith Officelemmy.worldimagemessage-square129fedilinkarrow-up11.17Karrow-down117
arrow-up11.15Karrow-down1imageWhite House Faith Officelemmy.worldDytallixB@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 天前message-square129fedilink
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·1 天前Does anyone know the correct procedure to challenge it? It’s only illegal if the laws are enforced.
minus-squareExcrubulent@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·1 天前You know, laws? Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in a stew?
minus-squareroot_beer@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 天前Yep, that’s p much what they’re doing with’m They’re not nearly as delicious tho
minus-square✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·edit-21 天前You need to have standing, which if the only impact is Congress’s budget then only Congress does. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flast_v._Cohen for establishment clause standing by regular taxpayers. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hein_v._Freedom_From_Religion_Foundation for the court throwing that out for the executive. They’d likely throw the whole thing out now.
minus-squareMannimarco@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 天前deleted by creator
No, totally unconstitutional.
Does anyone know the correct procedure to challenge it? It’s only illegal if the laws are enforced.
lol
What’s laws, precious?
You know, laws? Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in a stew?
Yep, that’s p much what they’re doing with’m They’re not nearly as delicious tho
You need to have standing, which if the only impact is Congress’s budget then only Congress does.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flast_v._Cohen for establishment clause standing by regular taxpayers. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hein_v._Freedom_From_Religion_Foundation for the court throwing that out for the executive. They’d likely throw the whole thing out now.
deleted by creator