• Actionschnils@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Especially because its quite complicated or impossible (imho) to a enact a law that does exactly what they promise by not breaking the constitution: Its just populism and a lie

      • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        They are quite aware of the constitution and it’s implications. Complicated, sure, but not impossible. I recommend to listen to van Aken talking about the topic.

        Calling it a lie is disingenuous.

          • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            Why do you keep calling it a lie? Their plan is concrete, actionable and reasonable likely to pass the courts. The one-time wealth tax in time of crisis (Vermögensabgabe) is well-grounded in the constitution and has precedent. The year-on-year wealth tax (Vermögenssteuer) also is based on the constitution (Art. 106 GG) and already exists on the books, it’s just permanently suspended because the constitutional court declared it illegal, for the reason that it didn’t treat real estate the same as other wealth. Which can be fixed, if a government wanted to.

            Is your problem that it won’t happen because Die Linke overwhelmingly likely won’t be part of the next government?

            • Actionschnils@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Its about making it work.

              You already know that a lot of the rich people arent paying a lot of taxes, right?

              If you want to make it work a intended, you have to break the constitution.

              • federal reverse@feddit.org
                shield
                M
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                21 hours ago

                Please find some source to corroborate that beyond “(imho)”. I already removed your previous comment for misinfo.

                E.g. while the existing wealth tax law has been ruled unconstitutional, that is only because of a few details in the law. The only reason that the law has never been reformed in a way that is constitutional is that CxU and SPD were always against a reform. I.e. the only reason is that it would hurt large donors.

              • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                22 hours ago

                How? This is about enforcing existing laws. The rich not paying taxes, through legal loopholes and illegal tax fraud, is the exact problem. Your still haven’t explained what about the plan would break the constitution.