Recently released data for the first six months of 2024 from Toronto Public Health has found that the median age of death for women experiencing homelessness in the city is just 36.
In 2022, unhoused women who died in Toronto were on average 42 years old. That number was 43 in 2023.
The median age at death for men experiencing homelessness in the first half of 2024 was 50.
Torontonians residents, in general, live much longer with men typically dying at the age of 78 and women at the age of 85, according to 2022 data.
This median number may have a counter-intuitive explanation. I don’t know about Toronto but here men form the large majority of visibly homeless people that I encounter. If that’s because women have more support, then the women who remain homeless may appear to be worse off than the men because the less disfunctional women who would have brought up the average life expectancy don’t end up homeless the way that the corresponding men do.
Thanks for a basic competency in statistics. This is just rage bait
Yeah this is just survivorship bias.
I’m wondering where you see mostly male unhoused people, as in what areas of your city you frequent. Because if you aren’t visiting red light districts where unhoused women often ply their trade to gain financial resources, I would suggest your anecdotal evidence is skewed at best.
I looked up an actual survey of homeless people in Toronto (from 2018).
Men represent over half (54%) of all respondents surveyed, and 73% of those surveyed outdoors. Women represent 42% of respondents surveyed, and 75% of those surveyed in family shelters.
Three times as many men as women sleeping on the streets.
Thank you. Your numbers are outdated tho. Here are updated counts from Toronto’s 2021 Street Needs Assessment., page 20-21.
but here men form the large majority of visibly homeless people that I encounter.
I’m wondering where you see mostly male unhoused people,
I looked up an actual survey of homeless people in Toronto
Your numbers are outdated [though]. Here are updated counts from Toronto’s 2021
Is that the one that shows the percentages have skewed even harder toward predominantly male homelessness?
I guess in answer to your earlier question, ‘where you see mostly male unhoused people’, the answer could be ‘everywhere, based on your numbers’ perhaps? It went from 3:1 to now 4:1.
if you aren’t visiting red light districts
In Toronto? The one in Canada or the one near Amsterdam?
What is it anywhere else? Just feels like there’s negative Canada news being plastered everywhere since the Trump bullshit started.
I don’t think it has anything to do with Trump, you might’ve jus been missing it. I’ve been working near a homeless shelter for years. It’s been bad for a long while, and has just been worsening. The way we treat homeless people is really fucked, especially since it could be any one of us.
Harsh climate and harsh economic conditions result in middle aged people dying…
The state and society: Pikachu face.
Fake news: we just don’t understand how this could be happening under a liberal regime 🤡
The Liberals aren’t the problem as the feds have little to do with provincial issues.
This is on Drug Fraud’s shoulders alone … and he couldn’t give a shit about poor unhoused women’s deaths.
Absolving federal government from the material conditions imposed upon the slave force is an a way to approach this issue lol
According the Constitutional divide of fed/provincial powers the only thing the feds can do is provide funding. Then it’s up to the provinces to use the funding appropriately.
That’s is narrow view of the causes of the issue and required solutions imho
But sure, state’s implementation is critical, but aint this is an endemic issue across all of Canada? Shit… all of North America (ex MX)?
Homeless and people are dying is the intentional product of the current regime.
It’s not an issue inherent to any regime, but one of economic motivators. The fundamental economic system is designed around the idea of squeezing value upwards through any means necessary. Governments are the force that prevents this sort of thing from happening excessively via regulations. It’s why Canada wasn’t hit nearly as bad as other countries during the 2008 financial crisis, because we had good banking regulations that prevented the worst from that happening over here. Unfortunately, those regulations got demolished a few years later, but the principal itself stands.
Part of governments is to be the moral stand that forces the economy to include morality as part of its working principal, despite every incentive of capitalism is to discard morality as an obstacle. It’s the balancing force that makes a country prosper not just materially, but culturally and morally.
That said, it is the failure of modern governments to enforce such moral behaviour these last two decades especially, but it is also a failure of us voters to force them to make good and uphold such morals in the first place. Governments are supposed to fear the masses, but we’ve let them go without fear for so long that they have all become quite entitled to their positions.
That said, it is the failure of modern governments to enforce such moral behaviour these last two decades especially, but it is also a failure of us voters to force them to make good and uphold such morals in the first place.
I would also add that the encroachment of the religious far-right from America has had a detrimental effect on how voters judge who is and is not acting in a “moral” way. Religiosity is still seen as having a “moral code”, even tho there are dozens/hundreds of immoral acts commited by such people (and institutions).
The Federal Government has pledged $6 billion in federal funding to address Canada’s housing crisis; however, to access the funds, provinces and territories must meet specific conditions[1][3]. One of these conditions includes allowing fourplexes to be built “as of right,” but Ontario Premier Doug Ford has rejected this idea[1].
Key Points:
- Canada Housing Infrastructure Fund The federal government is creating a $6 billion fund to construct and upgrade water, wastewater, stormwater, and solid waste infrastructure[1]. $1 billion will go directly to municipalities for urgent infrastructure needs[1][3]. The remaining $5 billion would be allocated through agreements with provinces and territories to support long-term priorities[3].
- Conditions Provinces must allow the development of four-unit residential dwellings to access the funding[5].
- Ontario’s Stance Premier Doug Ford has refused to force municipalities to allow fourplexes on residential land[5]. He believes municipalities should determine what is good for their communities[5]. The Ford government appears to be casting aside the federal government’s latest housing plan, which would require provincial buy-in on fourplexes in order to receiving funding from Ottawa in 2025[7].
- Federal Perspective The federal government is attaching strings to the money to incentivize changes needed to solve the national housing crisis[1]. Housing Minister Sean Fraser stated that the funding aims to “actually solve the national housing crisis, not just play at the margins”[7].
- Additional Measures The federal government is also increasing its housing accelerator fund by $400 million over three years, which is expected to help build an additional 12,000 homes[1][3].
- Criticism Conservative housing critic Scott Aitchison has dismissed the announcement as a " $4 billion dollar photo op fund"[1].
Citations: [1] Federal government pledges $6B for housing in new infrastructure … https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/justin-trudeau-budget-housing-1.7161005 [2] Ford threatens to cut off Ontario’s energy supply to U.S. if Trump … https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/doug-ford-ontario-premiers-meet-justin-trudeau-1.7407948 [3] Ottawa to launch $6B infrastructure fund to help build homes https://ottawa.citynews.ca/2024/04/02/ottawa-to-launch-6b-infrastructure-fund-to-help-build-homes-with-strings-attached/ [4] Provinces reject $6-billion housing program announced by Trudeau … https://www.reddit.com/r/CanadaPolitics/comments/1bumooo/provinces_reject_6billion_housing_program/ [5] Ford doubles down on refusal to allow fourplexes provincewide - CBC https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ford-fourplexes-infrastructure-funding-1.7162251 [6] Don’t be fooled: It was Doug Ford… - Meanwhile in Canada | Facebook https://www.facebook.com/MeanwhileinCanada1/posts/dont-be-fooled-it-was-doug-ford-who-gave-musk-the-hugely-over-priced-starlink-co/1022779166544123/ [7] Ford government could reject latest federal housing package https://globalnews.ca/news/10398150/federal-housing-fund-ontario-response/ [8] Ontario not budging on fourplexes despite federal funding on the line https://www.ctvnews.ca/toronto/article/ontario-not-budging-on-fourplexes-despite-federal-funding-on-the-line/ [9] Why Ottawa’s $6B housing infrastructure fund has some provinces … https://financialpost.com/real-estate/ottawa-6-billion-infrastructure-fund-provinces-fuming
A 14 year gap between the median age for women compared to men is 1000% certainly not a “climate” thing!
I am assuming the men get all the shelter spots and economic assistance while women are provided none of that in Canada.
Acute drug toxicity was the leading cause of death in the first half of last year for just over half of all reported deaths in people experiencing homelessness.
Unknown or pending explanations made up the second leading cause of death at 26 per cent, while diseases like cancer, chronic alcohol use, pneumonia, and others were listed as the reason for seven per cent of unhoused deaths in the city during that time frame.
I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that homeless women are even more vulnerable than homeless men. I think it’s less likely to be a case of the state providing preferential treatment.
Honestly, I think it comes down to mentality. As morbid as it sounds, men are used to toughing it out because that’s what’s expected of them, so are more likely to survive short term homelessness. And if you survive it in the short term, you have a good chance of surviving it in the long term.
Not to mention that men are probably more likely to already be abusing such substances before becoming homeless as an established coping mechanism, whereas more women probably start abusing those substances after, leaving them less experienced to avoid overdosing, or otherwise more prone using drugs in ways that threaten their health.
Either way, this isn’t an issue of the difficulty surviving on the streets, it’s an issue that people are forced to survive on the streets in the first place. Shelters are nothing more than a stopgap, and the city and province should be focusing their efforts on both preventing people from becoming homeless, as well as habituating those that have fallen that far.
Especially as once you become homeless, you lose the ability to get a new job since nobody will hire someone who arrives at an interview with bundled cloths and smelling of piss because they have no ability to get a shower.
Not to mention that the jobs that might actually be available are probably hard manual labour. The average homeless woman is not going to have the same level of physical strength, so will likely have less opportunities and less ability to defend herself in an often violent environment.
36 is not what I think of as middle aged. It’s young. And this is the median, so half are dying younger.
30-60 is middle aged.
There is nothing "young " about 38 which is above the median
30-60 is middle aged
According to whom? Fifty years ago, 40 was considered the lower bound for middle age, and if anything, the number should have gone up since then, not down.
i according to a concept like a median… if you are above the median you are not “young”
I would guess your first language isn’t English. “Middle age” is not a statistical term, but a traditional one that arises from dividing adults into three roughly equal-sized age groups:
- 20-39 years: young
- 40-59 years: middle age
- 60+ years: old
.
The lower bound will never drop below the traditional 40 years, although there has been some argument from time to time about raising it to match increases in life expectancy.
i think there is some weird cope in there lol
kinda like “middle class”
