Summary

Donald Trump reiterated his claim that Canada would be better as the U.S.’s 51st state, citing trade imbalances and lower taxes.

He also announced new 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, including from Canada, despite a recent 30-day reprieve.

Canadian PM Justin Trudeau has not formally responded, but a government source said they await official confirmation.

Trump criticized Canada’s defense spending and border security, despite recent Canadian commitments.

Canada previously retaliated against similar tariffs in 2018 before a 2019 trade deal resolved the dispute.

  • Saleh@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The US army is much larger and better equipped than the Canadian army. And the US has about 10x the population of Canada and most of the population lives within a few dozen miles of the US border.

    Also who is to support Canada with arms to defend against the US invasion? China? Russia? Because South Korea and the EU would first need to purge all the US bases they have.

    I think US vs. Canada would play out very different than Ukraine vs. Russia. Could end in a long and bloody incursion, but for the conventional side of things the US would steamroll Canada at first.

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Honestly, Canada is a terrible target from a guerrilla warfare perspective. We have vast areas of emptiness that locals are familiar with but are dangerous if you don’t know how to survive there, many pocket communities that could easily hide insurgents and weaponry, lots of farming, which means lots of nitrates, a populace that can easily disappear into the American general population, and enough of an identity to not want to be absorbed by a different culture.

      I don’t think we could stop America from invading and occupying, but we could make Vietnam look like a walk in the park. So, who’s up for another couple decades of occupation?

    • devils_advocate
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The US army is much larger and better equipped than the Canadian army.

      What % of the US army would be happy to obey an order to invade Canada. At what level if seniority? What justification could be given to sure up the troops?

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The same could be asked about the Vietnam invasion, the First Gulf War, Iraq invasion, Afghanistan invasion… From my perspective none of these had any convincing reason to give to the people, still Vietnam lasted for almost two decades. The occupation of Afghanistan also lasted two decades and there is still US troops in Iraq.

        If push comes to shove some bullshit reasons will be made up and i don’t trust the US executive to not obey. They are also letting some mid twenties kid fuck up the treasury system to hide payments being made or not made. And this is directly risking their own salaries.

      • HellsBelle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Nevermind that Canada has more than a few MAGA supporters/fascists in our military, so can’t count on 100% support from them.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Holding a country that doesn’t want to be held, that no one else wants you to occupy, is very different than winning it, as the US and other countries have repeatedly learned.

      And the unpopularity at home would make Vietnam look like nothing.

      No, it would be a disaster for the US. A very different one than Ukraine, but maybe even worse.

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Also who is to support Canada with arms to defend against the US invasion?

      US citizens…

      Could end in a long and bloody incursion, but for the conventional side of things the US would steamroll Canada at first.

      That will be kinda hard, with US citizens shooting at their backs.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I meant insurgency, not incursion. My bad. I think we are agreeing on what would happen.

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Well, except the part about steam rolling into Canada… Because US forces will have US citizens shooting at them while they attempt to enter Fort Erie, or Niagara Falls.

          Assuming that the US takes the most strategic point of entry, which I kinda doubt… Like they’d instead do something stupid like invade via Alaska, which I feel would have less pushback, in numbers, but a better armed citizenry fighting them on both sides.

          Alaskans love hunting with AR-10s.

          • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            If they had any brains, they’d create a salient by using the fifth column traitors in Alberta and Saskatchewan. Very little would hold them back in Maple MAGA country. They’d have both provinces in short order and then work on defending them.

            A bit like Hitler making a beeline for the Russian oil fields before he got distracted with taking Stalingrad because of “symbolism” or some shit.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      the US would steamroll Canada at first.

      that was the default convention in all the wars the USA has fought and lost in thevlast 40 years

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Has the US fought anyone even near parity since WWII? Its a big army but it has a hard time defeating guys living in tents and caves without resorting to carpet bombing.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Which is very different to Russias invasion of Ukraine in 2022, where after first quick gains that got repelled, things bogged down in a slow war of attrition.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Until the NATO countries have removed the US soldiers from their soil, most of the populated area of Canada would have been occupied already. There is around 100.000 US soldiers stationed in Bases in Europe. They need to be captured and disarmed first, before any forces can be send to defend Canada. That will take weeks at least. The US has the largest navy by far. Breaking the US naval blockade will take months if not years.

        An US invasion of Canada will mean months of war in Europe, before any chance of European troops getting to Canada.

        Unless the EU prepares quickly to kick out all American soldiers as well as build up a stockpile of anti-ship weapon, building jets and ships ourselves will take years, there is no way EU countries can come to the aid of Canada in time.

        • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I’m not sure any US strategist is willing to face the fallout of open war involving all of Europe. But then again, when has Trump ever cared about his advisors

          We are truly living in interesting times