• sumguyonline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    More importantly, with how this exact thing happened once 4yrs ago, how did the Democrats do nothing to add checks and balances for the abuses of power he so freely showed he was willing to commit last time? Not one law limiting executive orders, or codifying protections for positions the president chooses. So many additional steps they could have taken to curb the reach of the president, and they instead sat on their hands while the supreme court expanded the powers of the presidency to those damn near an emperor. Nearest we’ve ever been.

    • [email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Biden appointed an absurd number of judges, which is one check. That aside, republicans currently have all three branches of government. Four, if you count the bastardized agency of doge. You can’t fight something when you’re no longer in the ring.

    • pelespiritM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Tell me how that process would have worked? They would propose a law and then what?

        • lobut@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Republicans control the senate and Congress and even the Supreme Court. I think the Dems have had a limited window where they’ve had enough control. Not to mention when they have had some control they had members of their party like Sinema and stuff which have controlling votes.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            For some reason Republicans march in lock-step whenever they have power, but Democrats sabotage themselves with infighting. It happened when Obama had much larger majorities too - there’s always some Lieberman that gets in the way of the Democrat’s agenda. This doesn’t happen for Republicans, at least not nearly to the same extent. Doesn’t that strike you as strange?

            • Redacted@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              This is largely the crux of the divide. On the right they welcome anyone that doesnt oppose then fairly openly, whereas on the left people are so super critical of anyone that mightve been on their side that they push them away.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                And so the reason that Lieberman obstructed Obama’s agenda was because… the left was too critical of him? The reason Manchin and Sinema obstructed Biden’s agenda was because the left was too mean to them?

              • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Libs are right-wing. The dems welcome anyone who upholds the capitalist/imperial order. Politicians are completely united on that front.

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Even better: Use all these powers to help people instead of whining about how powerless the president is, and then they’d have been reelected in a landslide.