Summary

JD Vance argued that courts cannot overrule Trump’s executive orders, likening judicial interference to an illegal overreach.

Critics, including lawmakers and legal experts, denounced his claims as unconstitutional.

This debate follows recent federal rulings blocking Trump’s executive actions, including spending freezes and an order ending birthright citizenship.

Opposition figures warned against undermining the judiciary, emphasizing checks and balances.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Wouldn’t want the FCC to investigate you for BiAs aGaInSt CoNsErVaTiVeS now would you?

      But hey at least we aren’t a socialist country, they only do those things when you’re in a socialist country amirite? Thank God I don’t have taxpayer funded healthcare and affordable housing…

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      It was never their job. Not the most independent organization, not before the Washington Post chose darkness, not with Woodward/Bernstein, not during Edward R. Murrow’s reporting, none of it. These are private, for-profit businesses. If they have journalistic principles, that’s great! But that will never come before money…