cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 21 hours agounsafeCodelemmy.mlimagemessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up1207arrow-down111cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1196arrow-down1imageunsafeCodelemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 21 hours agomessage-square10fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareKwdg@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up23arrow-down1·20 hours agoNot needed, main in C++ implicitly returns 0 if there is no return
minus-squareLucy :3@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down7·20 hours agoShould ≠ Needs to You can do it, and it will work, but it’s unclean and not best-practice. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s undefined behaviour.
minus-squarexmunklinkfedilinkarrow-up19·19 hours agoJust to clarify. It is defined behavior - there’s plenty of undefined behavior in C but that ain’t one of them.
Not needed, main in C++ implicitly returns 0 if there is no return
Should ≠ Needs to
You can do it, and it will work, but it’s unclean and not best-practice. I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s undefined behaviour.
Just to clarify. It is defined behavior - there’s plenty of undefined behavior in C but that ain’t one of them.