• starman2112
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Because if it isn’t cheaper than simply growing trees, the money would be better spent simply growing trees

      • starman2112
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Try thinking for a second.

        Places where trees don’t grow are probably not the best places for carbon sequestration if you can’t sequester carbon there cheaper or easier than sequestering carbon in trees elsewhere