What was it about and what made you argue for so long? Did you win, did it conclude in anyway?

  • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I think the point was that racism has historically been used to distract from class warfare. If the ruling class doesn’t want the plebs to rise up, they keep the plebs distracted with something else like racism. Like if someone is arguing that class warfare is the true issue, they should be vehemently anti-racist as a result. But instead, this person was arguing that racism doesn’t exist, which runs counter to what someone educated about class warfare would believe. Because someone arguing about class warfare would believe that racism is manufactured by the elite. But the fact that it’s manufactured means it exists, even if it only exists due to artificial efforts to stoke it.

    • otp
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah, I might’ve misread the intention of the previous comment, which I’d guessed might’ve been an attempt to goad me into an argument in-line with what I described in my original comment, lmao