• gon [he]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    And this is BuggieBot’s comment:

    Yeah I was referencing that comment.

    Sequence of events:

    1. PR trying to change pronouns.
    2. Automated response citing policy.
    3. Author takes note of it for blog post.
    4. PR fixed and merged.
    5. Blog post published.

    Precocious, certainly, and I agree it was misguided. The blog post was indeed emotionally motivated, that’s more than clear.

    Sorry to beat a dead horse here

    It’s alright. I think these discussions need to be had.

    • sugar_in_your_tea
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Right, but the policy was commit hygiene (lots of small commits), which has nothing to do with the “no politics” policy. It’s right there in the comment, and the suggestion is to squash the commits into one.

      It’s alright. I think these discussions need to be had.

      Agreed. And unfortunately, I felt it necessary to be really wordy to not come off as supporting intolerance in any way, while still arguing that I would’ve done the same (reject 1-line cosmetic PRs).

      This is some kind of correlary to Poe’s Law, or perhaps Godwin’s Law.

      • gon [he]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Right, but the policy was commit hygiene (lots of small commits), which has nothing to do with the “no politics” policy. It’s right there in the comment, and the suggestion is to squash the commits into one.

        Suspiciously close to what Hitler would say… /s

        • sugar_in_your_tea
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Lol, got me there.

          Hitler would probably be a formatting Nazi too. Can’t have that <insert slur> extra whitespace.