• thesohoriots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      They literally don’t think too hard about it. Just feed them the next conspiracy line and they’ll latch on, no matter how hard it goes against the last one. “He was there because he was trying to stop it” was the approximate excuse I heard a few years ago.

    • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They don’t ignore it, they don’t care.

      They think elites should be able to do what they want— reactionary ideology was founded as a monarchical counterrevolutionary movement, and that’s the ideal they’re working backwards to achieve.

      Note that this obviously doesn’t apply to elites who aren’t aligned with their movement.

      They use rhetoric to divide the opposition and to rally their base; they don’t actually care about coherence.

      • They think elites should be able to do what they want

        Recently, one of my moms was ranting about how corrupt Biden was for pardoning his son (she didn’t even know what he was charged for - I got her to look it up and then her response was basically "well, he deserved it anyways because of corruption). Later the same day, we were talking about how Musk was abusing his position to fire people investigating his companies and my moms responses were “that’s smart”.

        There’s so much “as long as my team does it, it’s good and no matter what the other team does, it’s bad”

        • NotLemming@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Yep. It works exactly like cheating in sport. I know football fans who will want the harshest penalties for cheating in the opposite team, while just laughing and shrugging if someone in their team does the same thing or even worse. .

          • In this case, I kind suspect its an issue of saving face. They don’t want to admit that the team they supported are doing bad things, because it would admit being wrong. But until it starts to serious hurt them directly, they won’t care. Of course the current administration is actively trying to harm them, but I can’t imagine them admitting it until well after it happens…

            • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              7 hours ago

              For conservatives, their team is morally good so can do no bad. The other team is morally bad so can do no good. And the law is there to punish the bad people. The end result is selective enforcement of rules and laws against certain minorities.

        • mindbleach
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Reality itself is a team sport for conservatives.

          Their stated ideals are ad-hoc justifications. All that has ever mattered is ingroup loyalty. There is no other force in their moral universe.

          And they think it’s all you’re doing, because they think that’s all there is.

          • And they think it’s all you’re doing, because they think that’s all there is.

            Yep. They keep claiming that Biden is “your guy” or something like that. I never voted or supported Biden. Doesn’t matter how many times I point out I don’t support him or call out BS from the dems. Somehow because I think Republicans and Trump are worse means I’m automatically supporting Dems/Biden/Kamala.

            • Mouselemming
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Sooooo… Your nonvote helped elect Trump and now you’re unhappy about it? I’m so fucking sorry for you, dude.

              • WalrusDragonOnABike [they/them]@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                How do you figure? I can’t think of a single state where my one vote would have swung the election. Even if I could have voted 1 million times, it wouldn’t have changed the outcome. I voted for the dem in the senate election, which was closer: if I had just voted 1 million times there, it would have barely swung it!