• mindbleach
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That doesn’t mean anybody was killed.

    Or that any child was “explored.”

    I’m fucking disappointed that anyone professionally engaged in this wants to equate damning evidence of physical abuse with generic representation of the concept - for the exact reasons already described.

    There is an insurmountable difference between any depiction of a sex crime involving fictional children - and the actual sexual abuse of real living children. Fuck entirely off about throwing aspersions for why this distinction matters. If you don’t think child rape is fundamentally worse than some imagined depiction of same - fuck you.

    • otp
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      equate damning evidence of physical abuse with generic representation

      That’s not what it is.

      Just like AI-generated murder scenes are not being equated to physical evidence of someone having been murdered.

      I think you’re getting caught up in semantics. Can we at least agree that those AI-generated images are bad?

      • mindbleach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        “Generated sexual abuse” is explicitly being equated to actual child rape.

        These 25 people were not charged with thinkin’ real hard about the possibility of murder. The sting is described like they were caught doing some murder.

        • otp
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          The 25 people charged may have had other incriminating evidence against them.

          If you take issue with the law, take it up with the jurisdictions.

          If you think it should be perfectly okay for people to produce AI-generated CSEM, then I’m not really sure we can come to an agreement here.