• EarMaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    But these areas aren’t free. There are people or organizations (governments) owning these lands. They will want to have at least a non significant amount of your profits. You would have to redirect the asteroid with some precision and it would take a lot of resources to do so. You will loose 50% to 90% of the asteroids mass on atmospheric entry.

    The redirection alone will cost you several billions and to get your money back the asteroid would have to be of a certain size so it’s impact will have the effect of several megatons TNT (equivalent of hundreds of Hiroshima bombs). It will create a several hundred meter wide crater and have a much bigger blast radius.

    I don’t think we should give Elon Musk any stupid ideas…

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Of course the government leaning the land for the landing is going to ask for a cut, but if traditional mining companies extracting materials on earth pay nothing already (if we include the externallities of mining pollution), they’re not going to pay a lot for something that create value where before was just a dessert and the landing can be shopped around.

      And the rest sounds like problems to be solve.