• ansiz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It’s sad that even the idea of a very high tax rate for even the top 0.1% is off the table. I really like the suggestion of capping net worth at $999 million and the government gets the rest.

    • pumpkinseedoil@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      How does that work when for example a single company is worth two billion? Does the government now own >50% of it?

      • Kitathalla@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Easiest implementation would be shares start getting shared to all other employees. No more big owner when profits come from the laborers.

        • SippyCup@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          34 minutes ago

          Could you imagine the talent pool the most profitable companies would have if all net profits over X billion dollars were automatically redistributed to it’s labor force? Suddenly the wealthiest middle class on earth would be in the US until then somehow clawed that money back.

      • Ulvain
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It’s a question of wording in OP’s post - basically you tax based on net worth. And yes, boohoo it may mean you sell some of your buildings or part of your company to get there - including to things like Employee Ownership Trusts and other perfectly acceptable “curbed capitalistic” options.

        It’s still capitalism, don’t get your dollar-bill panties in a bunch folks, but not savage unfettered capitalism, that’s all.

        Why do you think Bezos is repurposing the Washington Post to become an agent of “the free markets”? The writing is on the wall…