No you don’t want to talk about it because it completely undermines your point. When you make a logical argument the logic of said argument is certainly not a different topic.
That “Slava Ukraini” is a “teeny bit” of nationalism
That a “teeny bit” of nationalism is ok.
So, to answer both points:
I don’t think that it’s a “teeny bit” of nationalism to reproduce an ultranationalist parole. If Germany gets a new Chancellor and we all exclaim “Heil Merz!” to wish him the best to lead the nation, I don’t think that would be accepted. Not even if Germany was invaded.
I disagree that a “teeny bit” of nationalism is ok. I think that this point was a derailment of the topic. I was talking about reusing paroles with a fascist background. Not nationalism. You canwt argue about Ukrainian nationalism on .world, because everyone will accuse you of being Putin’s bottom bitch.
If your logic can’t be applied to more than one scenario then your logic is flawed.
I’m not claiming that it’s not applicable. I don’t want to talk about a different topic.
No you don’t want to talk about it because it completely undermines your point. When you make a logical argument the logic of said argument is certainly not a different topic.
There were two points intsoduced:
So, to answer both points: