• TheBatz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s a fair argument. Although I am against making a generalization, especially since the IAEA who greenlighted the operations seems to be fairly independent

      • Corkyskog
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, I don’t assume that they didn’t do their diligence. I am just explaining why people wouldn’t automatically trust things solely because they have the title “scientist”, even it is a group of them.

        • Vashti@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The thing is that TEPCO and the Japanese government had such a conspiracy of silence going on, and such an insistence that their implementation of nuclear power was safe, that nobody believes a word they say - nor should they.

          Myself, I think the release is probably safe. But I’m not an expert, and I’m not really qualified to read scientific studies (which is an important thing to know about yourself), and I wasn’t lied to by the people now telling me this is totes harmless about how Fukushima was totes harmless until oh, it wasn’t.

          Shit’s complicated.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Correction: capitalism has been using scientists work. Scientists are people who need to eat too. They don’t have they word to say.