Ahoy mateys, it’s time to setup Jellyfin if you prefer not to pay for the privilege of self-hosting your own content.

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/27204525

We are also changing how remote playback works for streaming personal media (that is, playback when not on the same local network as the server). The reality is that we need more resources to continue putting forth the best personal media experience, and as a result, we will no longer offer remote playback as a free feature. This—alongside the new Plex Pass pricing—will help provide those resources. This change will apply to the future release of our new Plex experience for mobile and other platforms.

  • Syun@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’s pleasantly surprising that they aren’t deep sixing the lifetime pass.

    Yet.

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’m probably gonna set up Jellyfin this weekend. Any tips for a first timer?

      • easily3667@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        You can’t even fucking bring yourself to write hardware acceleration for the newbie asking for help?

        🤡

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Take it slow.
      Don’t ditch Plex just yet but slowly transition the move.
      Test it with your usual browser. If playback doesnt work, test with another browser or the phone app.

    • 007Ace@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Set up docker. I ran an installation on Linux and on Windows for a few years but having it running from docker using external drives for library is a game changer. Always up to date. User files and settings Safed on a seperate folder so you can transfer it to a different os any time. Fantastic.

      • ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This, also a recurring thing I keep hearing from people moving from Plex to Jellyfin is that not all media get recognised correctly.

        Which is probably because Jellyfin is less forgiving on file structure, file names. So check their site first for what Jellyfin needs: https://jellyfin.org/docs/general/server/media/shows

        It’s not unreasonable requirements just seems somehow Plex didn’t care about structure as much.

            • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              How so?
              I am outside of the states and have absolutely no issues with recognition. Not for TV, movie nor anime.
              And it’s usually available on tmdb or tvdb.

              • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                Should have clarified. It’s not an option if you want to use it to get content that is not in english. For german content for example, you need access to german private trackers which you only get with a good torrenting record in addition to catching the exceedingly rare opportunities to get an invite.

  • Pika
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I really don’t see how anyone in their hierarchy thought this was a good idea.

    There are at least 3 other competitors that moreorless work better than plex already does, without even having a subscription.

    I’m amazed they decided to go this route, especially when migrating is as simple as uninstall plex, install competitor of choice(like jellyfin), and then just specify media locations.

    the only real annoying part is remaking user accounts and losing watch progress/history, but there is usually a migration tool for that

    • deeply_moving_queef@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The key difference is client app support for various platforms. Jellyfin is far behind Plex on that front, and I say this as a user and advocate for Jellyfin. That’s a huge hurdle for migrating even just family and friends users.

      • Pika
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        I haven’t actually experienced this. I use my JF server on my roku, my Samsung tv (ok that was a pain because you have to side load it which requires a PC for TizenOs), all my families systems, and my tablet. The only systems I’ve found that seem to lack support of a jellyfin app is my ps5 and my xbox. It’s either been on native or been able to be side loaded on every smart tv I’ve used, and every mobile device has had an app in the app store allowing me to use it. I don’t understand the people saying there are no clients for it.

        • deeply_moving_queef@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Sure, every use case is different, and I didn’t say there’s “no clients for it”, just that, objectively, there’s a gap in client support for Jellyfin in the context of migrating from Plex.

          The gap also exists in maturity of available clients. In my case on tvOS/iOS, I’m using a third party client (Infuse) because Swiftfin is beta software and Jellyfin for iOS is a web view. I would have better feature coverage on Plex, if I could stomach that.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The reality is that we need more resources to continue putting forth the best personal media experience, and as a result, we will no longer offer remote playback as a free feature.

    What “resources” do you need, exactly, to allow my friends to stream from my server?

    • Pika
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      mr crabs money meme with mr crabs and an announcer outside of the krusty crab

      for real though, such a dumb decision on plex’s part lol

    • Carrot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Developers to keep things up to date and secure. Which I wouldn’t mind paying for, but instead they spend it all on making Plex a social media that emails your friends a list of shows you watch? I can tell you right now that other than “watch together” no one is using the Plex social features on purpose

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        What does that have to do with my friends streaming from my server?

        • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          they never said they needed resources for the remote playback… they said that they needed more resources - ie money to develop the software in general, and this are feature gating a useful feature to try and convince people to pay

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            they never said they needed resources for the remote playback…

            That’s exactly what it sounds like to me…

            • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              that’s fine… but it’s not necessarily what it says. it’s ambiguous at best, but if they’d meant they need you to pay them for resources then theyd probably say it more outright

        • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Their revenue stream is based on license fees for the software? So if they want to keep the lights on they need money

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Okay so you agree it’s nothing to do with “resources” and everything to do with locking features behind paywalls to drive up revenue?

            • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              developers are a “resource” and they need to be paid. Do you want to keep getting updates for your server? Someone needs to do that and that someone wants to be paid in this case

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Yet again, FOSS showing why it’s always the way to go vs proprietary tech. So glad I started my self-hosting journey with Jellyfin!

  • blink@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I was planning to switch to Jellyfin but having to sideload the app in my Samsung TV is a headache for me. But guess I will be doing exactly that now.

    • storm@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      If you really don’t want to deal with sideloading, Jellyfin can be accessed through an add on in Kodi (assuming Kodi is easily installable on the TV)

  • cujo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Just gonna… Drop this here…

    • im_not_here@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      In my experience Jellyfin doesn’t find or handle subtitles nearly as well, and I can’t watch modern movies without subtitles.

  • Mr. WorldWide@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’ve never paid even 1 cent to watch something online. Never paid for porn either.

    I’m not about to start

  • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I deleted Plex from my barely functional home server.

    I’ll give Jellyfin a try. I just want to be able to access my music away from home

  • Q The Misanthrope @startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I want to switch to jellyfin, I selfhost but I don’t want to open a port directly to my server. I don’t understand how everyone else figures this out and I’m apparently an idiot.

    Also do people expect all who use my server to start a VPN each time? What if they leave it on and their other streaming services are using my bandwidth.

    I don’t understand and I have looked it up but I don’t see a consensus.

    • amldvk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I just use Tailscale when remote streaming.

      From their docs:

      By default, Tailscale acts as an overlay network: it only routes traffic between devices running Tailscale, but doesn’t touch your public internet traffic, such as when you visit Google or Twitter. The overlay network configuration is ideal for most people who need secure communication between sensitive devices (such as company servers or home computers), but don’t need extra layers of encryption or latency for their public internet connection.

    • JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Opening a port isn’t really bad if you have your firewall configured properly. You will have to open a port either way with jellyfin or wireguard. If you have a TLS/SSL certificate then just doing jellyfin is fine (but have good passwords since it’s public facing), otherwise a VPN like wireguard will handle encryption for you.

      As for managing traffic on the VPN you can follow this advice: https://serverfault.com/questions/1075973/wireguard-how-to-only-tunnel-some-of-the-traffic

      Basically setup your firewall to stop extra traffic on your end, and change accessible IPs in wireguard to your service(s) so the peer knows not to talk on that interface for unrelated things.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        you can do a thing called UDP hole punching for NAT traversal, buuuuuut afaik these days a lot of consumer routers consider it a security risk and attempt to block it

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It isn’t bad until an exploit is discovered on jellyfin. Then it can get really bad.

    • brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      13 hours ago

      In my own house, or just myself. Jellyfin is fine. I haven’t spent as much time on it though compared to Plex.

      Plex has its own user auth, I don’t need to manage that. My friends and family don’t have to hit me up for password resets.

      It has apps on pretty much every device.

      Users can just log in. They don’t need to know what server to type in.

      • Kurroth@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Yer it’s clear people who go on about not understanding either have small circles of users, or don’t actually support people…

        You aren’t getting Pop and Nan to understand how to troubleshoot or setup Jellyfin access on their old TV compared to just throwing in a Chromecast or fire stick and having Plex auto logon with an account you setup for them if the couldn’t. Makes life a ton easier, even at the cost of other liberties.

        They just want to watch Zulu or Are you being Served again, nothing more.

      • Pika
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        TIL that jellyfin doesn’t support an actual password reset. I’ve never had to actually try. That’s somewhat disappointing.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I am a lifetime Plex Pass User… I am not affected by their BS… Yet (watch together is going though).

    • Wolf314159@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s a lot easier to setup and get non-techy family to join. Setting up Jellyfin is easy until you want access outside your LAN. Setting up TLS or a VPN is a hassle I don’t want unless there is no other option. Plex has features I (and my family) use that jellyfin doesn’t support by default yet. Last I checked syncing of files for offline viewing in the official app wasn’t very good yet. Plex has a bunch of ad supported live streams baked in that aren’t too bad. There is a “How It’s Made” channel, a Mythbusters channel, and Top Gear channel. PlexAmp isn’t perfect, but it’s better than any of the Jellyfin options I’ve seen.

    • Carrot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I will make the switch once they revoke my lifetime pass, but in the meantime I’m really hoping that Jellyfin gets a face lift. I’ve tested Jellyfin a good bit and it mostly has feature parity for everything I care about, but it’s UI is objectively uglier than Plex’s

    • Dave.@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Inertia, mostly.

      Of course Plex then takes advantage of that with the slow erosion of the free edition.

    • lka1988
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Because some of us bought the lifetime Plex Pass for cheap many years ago and it’s what our family is used to. Plex also passes the “wife test”, and my kids use Plexamp on their phones for music.

      Not gonna stop me from ditching Plex in the not-too-distant future though, once I figure out Jellyfin and another local music streaming app that doesn’t have an interface stuck in 1997.

    • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It syncs all movie covers and metadata automatically. When I used jellyfin last, this was a struggle.

      • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s only an issue if the files aren’t properly named. If you’re using *arr this won’t be an issue. E.g. “Title (Year) - TMBD/TVDB ID” works flawlessly.

        • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          That’s good to hear. I’ve got an arr setup so this is promising whenever plex becomes unusable to me.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I paid Plex Pass Lifetime for peanuts (maybe $50 or $75) a decade ago, not using it would mean wasting that so yeah…

  • Krusty@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’m actually using Jellyfin but I hate the fact that there’s no easy way to install a client on Samsung TVs (Tizen OS) :(

    • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Is there an easy way on any smart tv? I’ve got a Sony, it’s been a pain for some things but I haven’t tried jellyfin or emby on it yet.

    • x2Zero7
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Soon™ it’ll be on the store. Having to build and push to tizen is the absolute worst part of jellyfin (if you have to) otherwise there’s clients for every platform - even LG’s webOS.

      There’s also finamp for music specific playback, so jellyfin can pretty much do everything

    • quid_pro_joe@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      There is a alpha client and instructions available here: https://smartdigihere.com/jellyfin-on-samsung-smart-tv/

      However as stated further down the article, it’s easier to just use a web browser and access your jellyfin server that way. Login, bookmark the URL (don’t forget to include the port) and then hit full screen.

      Note: You may need to tweak (server side) your transcoding and subtitle settings.

  • Madbrad200
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Plex has been on a downward spiral for awhile now. This will really kill the service for a lot of people, wonder if Plex sharing will be a thing of the past and people switch to jellyfin sharing

    • MaggiWuerze@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think most people that host a server already had the lifetime license so this won’t affect them