• tiramichu@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Looking back, I think we can say that the year 2000 was a much better time than 2025

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        There are some things where fax still makes sense. Maybe I’m old, but I’m not a fan of “digital signatures” and “digital seals” for professional licenses. In cases where a document needs to be signed and/or sealed, I would much prefer a fax to a PDF with a “digital seal”. But that’s just me and I’m a weird dude.

        • sugar_in_your_tea
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          There are some things where fax still makes sense

          Nope.

          Fax is insecure, you’d be better off signing w/o a “digital seal” or whatever and emailing it in. You can also print, sign, scan, and send, just like w/ a fax, but send as a PDF instead of insecurely over the telephone wires. I’ve done both digital signatures and scanned regular signatures, both work and are better than fax.

        • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Modern PDF signing creates a digital fingerprint showing the device it was used on, whose credentials were used, a timestamp, and even a location if location services are turned on.

          But yea, I guess all that just can’t compete with the ironclad security of a fucking ink pen. Oh, sorry. A copy of an ink pen. So much more secure and traceable.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think it means that they were ahead of the curve prior to the year 2000, which is when they started to fall behind the curve.

        Not going to comment on the accuracy, but it makes sense to me.

    • trustnoone@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I actually find this interesting, part of me wonders if there technological advancement meant they didn’t need to make changes/innovation, which led to others having issues having to innovate beyond what Japan did.

      Hence why they are still stuck in 2000s