• webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      Bet you love blackbird

      It is powered by wind to go 4 times the speed of wind, downwind.

      There are also 2 veritasium and many other vids on it that try to explain how its possible.

      • Ajen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 days ago

        The blackbird works because the turbine is so big, and the rest of the vehicle is very aerodynamic. Unlike that thing in the OP…

          • Ajen
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            Looks like a 100W panel, which couldn’t generate enough power to propel a light-weight bicycle, let alone a moped with a battery. It might be enough to offset the weight and drag it adds, but that’s only when it’s in direct sunlight.

  • Ajen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    The author says it isn’t a joke, then goes on to say:

    How true these numbers are, no one seems to have a clue. Clearly because there is no proof of this thing even running.

    • madame_gaymes@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      TBF, there is a big difference between “advertising a product as a joke with no intention of production” vs “we intend to produce this but we haven’t tested it fully yet”/“we don’t want you to see the numbers, just buy it”

      The author is still accurate. The product isn’t a joke. It may not be a smart idea, and it may not work, but it isn’t a joke. They even provided a link to the site where you could purchase it from China at the end of the article.

      • Ajen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        If it doesn’t work it’s still a joke, just not in the sense you’re thinking.

        • madame_gaymes@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          I’m thinking in the same sense that the author is. They actually meant a literal joke, as in April Fools, because they said as much in the first paragraph.

          The original comment comes off like you’re accusing them of being contradictory with themselves, but they’re not.

          • Ajen
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 days ago

            I am saying the author is contradicting themselves, but I wasn’t trying to draw attention to the dual meaning of the word “joke.”

            That “thing” is not legit, as the headline claims. It’s a joke, I’m just not sure if the author or designer are in on it.