r/The_Donald now on Lemmy - Lemmy Online
lemmyonline.com
It was banned on Reddit because it is racist, hatefull and spread Conspiracies. In my new community I expect the exclution of racist communities. It is easy now with defederation. Nazis can do whatever they want on their instances, but the instances I want to be part of should not amplify their shit and flush it into our timelines. The instance-admin of [email protected] [/c/[email protected]] did not reply to my message. Big instances seem not to defederate with them. The new TD may not be a success, the point is not to give Nazis a platform like it is happening now. Fans of TD are racists. Where are the instances that show face against racism? edit: to contact the admins: @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]
    • HTTP_404_NotFound@lemmyonline.comOPEnglish
      113·
      2 years ago

      I mean, what else do you want me to do about the issue?

      There is too much content I wish to view at sh.itjust.works. There are lots of valuable communities in place.

      As such, defederation, is not the correct tool in this case.

        • HTTP_404_NotFound@lemmyonline.comOPEnglish
          81·
          2 years ago

          OK… (From your earlier comment)

          You’re accepting the nazis at your bar

          Let’s be perfectly clear, this is YOUR BAR. (I am an outsider, visiting from a different bar, in another state).

          That user, and that community, are 100% banned from MY instance.

        • Difficult_Bit_1339English
          72·
          1 year ago

          Why should I? You guys, and you the first, defend keeping exploding-heads federated. It’s enough from an outsider’s point of view.

          Because, and I’m making a large assumption here, you’re attempting to respectfully have a good faith conversation about a topic.

          In this conversation you made an assertion, to wit:

          You’re accepting the nazis at your bar.

          and I requested that you provide proof of your claim. This seems like a reasonable request and philosophy actually has something to say about the matter:

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)

          When two parties are in a discussion and one makes a claim that the other disputes, the one who makes the claim typically has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim especially when it challenges a perceived status quo.

          So, show the proof that backs up your statement. If there are ‘Nazis at [our] bar’ then where are they?

          I mean, if there isn’t any proof of what you’re saying then and you’re just engaging in name calling and bad faith discussion then that would seem to violate the ‘Be Respectful’ rule of the instance.

            • Difficult_Bit_1339English
              72·
              1 year ago

              Does it have to come exclusively from here?

              Yes, if you’re discussing ‘Nazis at your bar’ then you should point to the Nazis at this bar. Not at any Nazis at any bar on the planet.

              I don’t care about convincing you, and I’ll tell you bluntly that your large assumption is wrong.

              So you’re not here attempting to respectfully have a good faith conversation? That certainly saves me a lot of time in responding to you.

              I would advice against the continuing disrespectful comments. Especially from someone who is so keen on seeing the rules enforced.

        • M Force @exploding-heads.comEnglish
          75·
          1 year ago

          Because you are lying and have zero nazi post to link to. Especially from thedonald on sh.itjust.works. Trump is to nazis as water is to cats. Nazi’s can’t stand him.