Tests of seawater near Japan’s Fukushima nuclear power plant have not detected any radioactivity, the environment ministry said on Sunday (Aug 27), days after authorities began discharging into the sea treated water used to cool damaged reactors.

Japan started releasing water from the wrecked Fukushima plant into the Pacific Ocean on Thursday, sparking protests within Japan and neighbouring countries, in particular China, which banned aquatic product imports from Japan.

Japan and scientific organisations say the water is safe after being filtered to remove most radioactive elements except for tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen.

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As totally expected.

    I’m no scientist, but even I know the basics of how it works. And then there’s the actual scientists…

      • SIGSEGV
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        62
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Super safe. We should all do it. Sure even the fish’d appreciate it, you absolutely dumbfuck.

        How can you possibly think it is safe?

        “Only this, only that, only a bit, only so many rads”. They’re still dumping their fucking issue into everyone’s ocean. Fuck off with your Japanese cocksucking behavior. They’re terrorists as far as I’m concerned.

        Edit: “But there’s already radiation in the ocean”. “The sun makes radiation, too!” “You’re a dumbass because China makes more radiation than Japan does!” Are you all bots? Ffs. So dumb and annoying. You’re not right.

        • Pogbom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you have any evidence to go against the tests in the article or are you just rambling?

          • SIGSEGV
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            40
            ·
            1 year ago

            Read my update. Evidence? Yes, it is radioactive waste they don’t want anywhere on their own soil. That should tell you enough.

            • nbafantest@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              They actually looked into other methods, such as evaporation and it’s simply not as safe as this method.

              • SIGSEGV
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Safe? Safe for whom?? Bury it in a mountain or something, but it is obvious they don’t want it on their soil!

                Assholes, ffs.

            • AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Uh huh. You are aware that pretty much everything has radioactivity in it? And that there are serious regulations on the limits of those due to it generally being a bad thing. Those regulations determining safe limits for it. As in, it is safe. As in, no harm is done. When you stay within those limits, you’re fine. Just like with every single thing regarding chemicals and waste, and pretty much anything. That is why the regulations exist in the first place.

              • SIGSEGV
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Why defend them? If it was safe, they’d just dump it somewhere on their own land, right? It totally isn’t safe.

                Go watch Chernobyl, because reading and critical thinking aren’t your strong suits.

                • AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So you are basing “it’s not safe” on the fact that they are doing the thing that has been deemed safe?

                  I better go watch that TV show asap.

        • emperorgormet
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well it’s been filtered for all radioactive material except tritium and is well below the level of concentration the UN allows for drinking water. They are not detecting any radiation currently and and releasing the water very slowly over 30 years. Did you just not read the article or what?

        • chaogomu@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          You do realize that the ocean has been full of radioactive material for billions of years, right? Uranium oxide is water-soluble. You can literally pull uranium out of ocean water if you know the right chemistry.

          Hell, you’re currently being exposed to ionizing radiation right this second. So am I, so is every one. Go outside, pick up a handful of dirt and there will be trace amounts of uranium, and likely some thorium. Have a radon detector in your basement? That’s radioactive, and comes from the natural decay of uranium.

          Do you drink well water? Water-soluble oxides of uranium. Which is why damp basements accumulate radon.

          The detected levels of radiation in this discharge water are actually lower than standard background radiation from all the uranium that’s literally everywhere.

        • nbafantest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          All water gives off some levels of radiation. Every water drop you’ve ever drank has.

          The levels are very low.

          This is no exception.

          Please stop posting anti-nuclear nonsense.

          • SIGSEGV
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not anti-nuclear; I’m anti pollution. Especially when it could have been avoided by building a better facility.

        • claudiop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Did it occur to you that most things in nature have radioactive isotopes and that for nuclear reactors we look for the most radioactive bunch, refine them to remove the least radioactive bits and then use them in reactors?

          If you reverse that process (well, not really a reversal as you now have different atoms) and re-dillute stuff in nature in a sensible way, you’re not going to get anything that is substantially above ambient levels. The oceans are tremendously big and the waste water is already quite treated. One is not going to notice a change in relative terms anywhere on earth unless high-precision equipment is used.

          This is not a very-scientifically-accurate comment, but if it was you would not understand so lets keep it like this.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is naturally radioactive elements dissolved in water and it doesn’t really hurt us. We’re bathed in radioactivity all day every day and it doesn’t really hurt us. Releasing this water will effectively change nothing. There’s a lot of water in the ocean and it’s already naturally dissolved radioactive elements, like uranium and other things. How is a tiny bit more going to cause harm?

          • SIGSEGV
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Literally, go jump in a nuclear reactor’s storage pool. You don’t know what you’re talking about, but you’ll learn real quick.

              • SIGSEGV
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Goddamn y’all are so dumb. Let’s all dump our radioactive waste in the ocean then, if it is so safe. America has literal tons of it.

              • SIGSEGV
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Goddamn y’all are so dumb. Let’s all dump our radioactive waste in the ocean then, if it is so safe. America has literal tons of it.

                • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s not just dumping radioactive waste into the ocean. It’s dumping water that has been cleaned and has very little contaminants into the water. Dumping human waste into the water isn’t good either, but taking precautions it can be done safety without much risk.