snaggen@programming.dev to Rust@programming.dev · 2 years agoIf you feel that you need a Rust replacement for 'ls', that apparently existsgithub.comexternal-linkmessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up189arrow-down15file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up184arrow-down1external-linkIf you feel that you need a Rust replacement for 'ls', that apparently existsgithub.comsnaggen@programming.dev to Rust@programming.dev · 2 years agomessage-square25fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareyoshi@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoAnyone tried it and has an argument as to why people should use it over ls?
minus-squareautokludge@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years ago‘Should’ is a pretty strong word, try it out if you want. I mainly use it because it colorizes the output nicer than ls, but it also has git awareness if you need it.
Anyone tried it and has an argument as to why people should use it over ls?
‘Should’ is a pretty strong word, try it out if you want.
I mainly use it because it colorizes the output nicer than ls, but it also has git awareness if you need it.