• @Hagarashi8
    link
    15
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wonder how many people went this path because of sign

    • @lewosadebu
      cake
      OPM
      link
      61 year ago

      haha I was wondering the same. The sign is very robust and aggressive, so I wondered if there were earlier versions people still ignored.

      • @Hagarashi8
        link
        31 year ago

        I mean, if i will see this kind of sign, i would go this way even if it’s gonna make my path longer.

  • @sbv
    link
    121 year ago

    denial path

    • @lewosadebu
      cake
      OPM
      link
      91 year ago

      I liked this so much, I actually updated the title 😆

      • God
        link
        61 year ago

        what was the previous title?

  • @LetterboxPancake
    link
    81 year ago

    It’s not about the 1-2 meters you don’t have to walk, it’s about the sharp turn. That wears your soles down and slows you. Can’t have that. If they’d adapted and created banked corners, people would follow their path for sure.

  • Rickety Thudds
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    Cool of them to provide a sign that gives you a tiny rebellion high. The city must really value civil disobedience.

  • Gadg8eer
    link
    11 year ago

    Problem is, the path leads into a fence. Or at least that’s what it looks like to me from the angle in the photo?

    • @lewosadebu
      cake
      OPM
      link
      31 year ago

      Doesn’t it directly lead to the pedestrian crossing?