sh.itjust.works
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
produnis@discuss.tchncs.de to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 years ago

welcome

discuss.tchncs.de

message-square
41
link
fedilink
565

welcome

discuss.tchncs.de

produnis@discuss.tchncs.de to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 years ago
message-square
41
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    2 years ago

    Jokes on you. I’m a Machinist and that feature on the drawing has an perpendicularity GD&T callout of ± 1deg. In spec is in spec. Ship it!!!

    • Late2TheParty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      I like this positive attitude!

    • eatham 🇭🇲@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s 87 degrees

      • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        No, no- it’s the design engineer who is clearly wrong.

        • c_jay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Nah I blame the mathematicians

    • sharpiemarker@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Full send

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    As long as it’s perfectly 89° it’s fine. That’s acute angle.

    • Selmafudd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s very well drawn too, no overshooting on the edges. Looks good to me.

    • eatham 🇭🇲@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s 87

    • roon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Barely acute 😳

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 years ago

    Engineers: Eh, close enough.

    • theotherone@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      shrugs Same order of magnitude

  • omgitsaheadcrab
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Is it exactly 89°?

    • produnis@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      2 years ago

      No. It’s wrong, too. Have a nice day :)

    • Jay
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 years ago

      I saw this before and if I remember correctly, it’s more like 87°.

    • RedEye FlightControl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      No. It measures about 87°.

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Wtf?! The fact that OP got it wrong is even more disturbing!

        • eatham 🇭🇲@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Wrong on purpose

        • Jay
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          OP didn’t make this

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 years ago

    I didn’t know 1° difference would be this noticeable. I am very disturbed.

    • eatham 🇭🇲@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s noticable cos its 87 degrees not 89.

  • neoney@lemmy.neoney.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    Guys it’s actually 90° but the photo is taken on an angle.

  • wheeldawg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 years ago

    90° isn’t any more perfect than 89°. Unless it was supposed to be 90°.

    So if you post this exact thing but include the right angle indicator, that would make the image work as intended.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It’s supposed to be 89° but is actually 87°. So it qualifies as imperfect.

      • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Love it (after I confirmed it to be true via the rotate function in the photo editor)

      • wheeldawg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Oh shi-

  • imgonnatrythis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    More concerned about why you wasted all those colors on this image when two was sufficient?

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    Ahhh, I love it when the 89 degree angles are perfectly 89 degrees.

  • Dale@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ll see you in hell

  • Spliffman1@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

  • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    You should have put the little square thing in the corner to indicate a right angle!

  • spacesweedkid27 @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s still perfect since you can just take 32040 of these (= 89*360, ggt is 1 since 89 is prime) and then you will have a full circle. A real shame it would have been when you would have took an irrational amount of degrees since then this calculation would not be possible. There could only be an approximation that makes it impossible in reality to decide if it is right or not but mathematically speaken it would be impossible.

  • NarendraCzar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Wish i didn’t see this

    • NarendraCzar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Anybody who posts images like this have a special position in hell

  • FellowEarthling@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    I can’t believe you’ve done this

Memes@lemmy.ml

memes@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 381 users / day
  • 2.49K users / week
  • 6.78K users / month
  • 21.9K users / 6 months
  • 2.52K local subscribers
  • 50.5K subscribers
  • 13.3K Posts
  • 282K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
  • sexy_peach@feddit.de
  • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
  • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org