I’m rather curious to see how the EU’s privacy laws are going to handle this.

(Original article is from Fortune, but Yahoo Finance doesn’t have a paywall)

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Delete the AI and restart the training from the original sources minus the information it should not have learned in the first place.

    And if they claim “this is more complicated than that” you know their process is f-ed up.

    • gressen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re right, this is a way to solve this issue. It’s just not economically feasible to retrain your model from scratch every time. It takes a lot of money to do it and they will push back.

      • ram@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then AI cannot exist in a world where security still matters.

          • ram@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            They go hand-in-hand. You have no need for security without privacy. You cannot have privacy without security.