Shoppers in Texas no longer have to pay a sales tax on menstrual products, making the state one of the few in the nation to eliminate the so-called “tampon tax.”

A new law that went into effect Friday eliminates the sales tax on feminine hygiene products including items like tampons, menstrual pads and menstrual cups.

In addition to menstrual products, the law, S.B. 379, also eliminates the sales tax on family care items including diapers, baby bottles, baby wipes, maternity clothing and breast milk pump products.

  • dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    173
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wait, this will disproportionately help women, what is Texas doing?

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      95
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think I figured it out.

      Since every other law is attempting to force women to be stay at home moms, men are having to foot the bill for menstrual products, and we can’t be burdening men with such women problems.

      OR Republican Texas men don’t know what tampons are for because sex ed in Texas, so the women who sponsored it lied and said it’s for babies.

      • Wogi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Looking at the bill, a brief glance would make it seem that all it does is eliminate taxes for some stuff. You’d have to actually read it to find out what stuff it eliminates taxes on, which most Republicans won’t do. They see fewer taxes and they vote yes.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        A far too large group of people think tampons can be safely used for gunshot wounds, and this is Texas we’re talking about so…

        • sewerkat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Weren’t modern pads invented by military nurses using bandages? I see how that factoid could give people the wrong idea

      • jasondj@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Still doesn’t make sense. Any man with a kid and half a clue knows that they don’t bleed when they’re pregnant. Thus, tampons are only necessary when women aren’t fulfilling their wifely duties, barefoot and pregnant.

        I mean, it really was seeming like the GOP wants every woman to be carrying their spawn (against their will) from menarche to menopause.

      • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Texas does something nice

        Half the thread: Let’s find some reason to bash on Texas!

    • ivanafterall@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe they figure they should try to help out since they’re trying to force women into pregnancies against their will.

    • Laughbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh don’t worry it got bundled with a bunch of other bull shit look up Death Star law if your not already aware

    • Aviandelight @mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I really want to have a positive outlook about this type of thing because I do want to help people. That being said there is nothing stopping retail from marking the price back up to what it would’ve been with the sales tax and just pocketing the extra.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Something… Something… competition. Something… Something… capitalism.

        Yeah, no, you’re correct that’s what they’ll do.

    • Kerred@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      According to the links, the law was sponsored by Donna Howard (Dem) and Angie Button (Rep). Said 13 yays and 4 abstained from the financial committee.

      Hopefully women constituents from both sides encouraged their reps to push forward.

  • atzanteol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is great - but is the “tampon tax” just “normal sales tax”?

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, but it sounds more like a special imposition placed on women for being women if we talk about the “tampon tax” instead of arguing about whether or not there should be special cutouts on sales tax for products used primarily or exclusively by women.

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes. Problem is it only affects 50% of the population.

      It would be fair(er) if it taxed Viagra at the same rate.

      • UltraFiestaMango@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        lol why do idiots always say this? no one NEEDS to use viagra - ever. Can’t get it up? deal with it. But half of the population NEEDS menstrual products, or there will be blood everywhere and that’s a biohazard.

        • atzanteol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I get what you’re saying and agree, but damn that’s a “heavy flow” day.

          Women dealt with this issue for thousands of years without it being a like a scene from Carrie.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or condoms, except in many states condoms actually are subject to sales tax like most other goods. Prescription drugs in general aren’t subject to sales tax, which is why Viagra wasn’t, same as birth control pills, insulin, blood thinners, etc.

  • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sure there’s some Republican politician someplace in Texas saying that women have the ability to shut their periods down if they try, and they don’t need socialist tampons.

  • xylogx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This look to me like an advocacy group successfully advocating for common sense legislation:

    “Advocates for menstrual equity who oppose a tax on menstrual products say the taboo around menstruation and the lack of access to menstrual products hurts women economically because it costs them money for products and may keep them from attending jobs and school. Poor menstrual hygiene poses health risks for women, including reproductive issues and urinary tract infections.”

  • Jeredin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    GOP is simply trying to make the state unwelcoming to progressives and move out the ones that can/will, just so there’s no chance of losing the state to the left. FL and other many other GOP states are doing the same - simple as that: electoral votes.