As the U.S. government built its latest stretch of border wall, Mexico made a statement of its own by laying remains of the Berlin Wall a few steps away.

The 3-ton pockmarked, gray concrete slab sits between a bullring, a lighthouse and the border wall, which extends into the Pacific Ocean.

May this be a lesson to build a society that knocks down walls and builds bridges,” reads the inscription below the towering Cold War relic, attributed to Tijuana Mayor Montserrat Caballero and titled, “A World Without Walls.”

      • Throwaway@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        90
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is CIAs operation. Cartels own Mexico, CIA owns the Cartels.

        Close the border, stop the flow, and criple the CIA.

          • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Or even reducing the profitability of smuggling drugs by legalizing some of the most popular ones or something. But I guess then they would also lose the Jim Crow 2.0 and would need to come up with something else.

              • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                16
                ·
                1 year ago

                If legal alternatives undercut their main income stream, yes, they’ll disappear. Or rather, they’ll fall apart as their resources become scarce and the ‘middle managers’ being cut out of the remaining money start fighting the higher ups and each other.

                Ending alcohol prohibition didn’t strengthen the bootleggers. It put them out of business as Budweiser ate their lunch.

                  • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    11
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    They’ll almost certainly try to (and some people who are currently involved may see some success). But they won’t have their de facto monopoly anymore. And these organizations are rife with internal corruption (shocking, I know); they aren’t being run efficiently.

                    Without their monopoly profits, they aren’t going to be able to afford the hit squads, the bribed law enforcement, or the silence of the people who know where the bodies are buried (often literally).

                    Crime won’t magically fall to zero overnight, but these organizations will not be having a good time.

                  • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The fact that they (mostly) aren’t doing it with the drugs that are legal, should tell you why. And you already have precedent to know what happens when drugs get legalized - the Mafia is not selling bootlegged alcohol anymore.

          • primalanimist@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            I want to help control the activities of the CIA. Hmm, I know, let’s build a wall, that will certainly stop the CIA. If this was just about the CIA, we wouldn’t be talking about building a wall because of just how stupid that sounds. The CIA can be stopped with a wall? They have the power to smuggle drugs into Mexico, to be sold in the US. You think they are going to let a wall stop them? LOL No, this has never been about stopping the CIA and more about political ideologies and wasting more taxpayer money on NOT the taxpayers.

          • cloaker@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            29
            ·
            1 year ago

            borders closed, supply shortens, prices rise and the only people who lose are addicts and the people who lose out due to addicts being left with no support.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Good thing there isn’t a second, huge, undefended border on the other side of the United States that smugglers could easily use if they wanted to.

        • Running_Out_Of_Plans
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why not remove power from the CIA directly?

          At any rate, enforcement policies simply do not work in terms of effectiveness or money. Read Narconomics by Tom Wainwright. He’s an economist who looks at the drug trade like an industry, and he’s got a pretty thorough breakdown of how much these policies cost versus their effectiveness.

          Not to mention that the way the CIA justifies itself is by claiming to protect us from all these shadowy evil foreign organizations coming to take your rights. Going all in on a border wall is pretty much endorsing their propaganda wholesale. It’s exactly what a lot of these CIA ghouls want–more money for their buddies in ICE.

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      World’s largest drug consumer has harsh words for neighbour who can’t stop drug dealers from walking across neighbour’s property to sell him drugs.

    • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You mean those drug businesses that were started by the CIA, financed by american customers and defended with guns coming in from america?