• whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I honestly feel like it’s a mistake that USB-C means almost nothing outside of “it’s got this port shape.” The idea was that you have one port and one cable, and you plug whatever you want into it. In practice, virtually no where is this true. Is this a data port or power only? What speed for either? Does the port support Thunderbolt or no? Video or no? Does the cable support data or just power? What speed? Video? Which HDMI spec? Thunderbolt? Grab 3 random devices with USB-C and 3 random USB-C cables and see how often you get the intended outcome.

      Tbh I think the only goal that USB-C really accomplishes is that it’s less shitty than micro-usb (might as well make all of those ports/connectors out of paper mache) or USB-A (let’s make a port shape that there is no way for anyone living or dead to plug in correctly the first time.)

      • jasondj@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nearly every USB-A male I’ve seen has a USB logo carved into the rubber boot.

        This is on the “up” side of the cable, and would face “up” from the perspective of how the computer is intended to be used (or from the perspective of the motherboard, if we’re talking about a tower PC).

    • wheeldawg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why assume the cable would have low speeds? Are those enough cheaper to justify that?

      I mean, it would be a trademark Apple kind of thing to do, for sure. They may take privacy seriously, but literally every other thing they do is pure scumbag.

      I don’t wanna assume they are 3.0 speed either, but do we know one way or the other?

      Also, is there really a use for 240W cords? I’ve never heard of a phone accepting triple digit speeds at all, and even a tablet wouldn’t go that high.