• PsychedSy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re assuming he existed and was necessary for the cult to start. Paul may be a better target.

      • SolarNialamide@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don’t have to assume Jesus existed, you just have to accept the historical evidence which there is plenty of

        • PsychedSy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am fine accepting historical consensus on the subject, but I personally have some issues with that particular specialty and their allegiances.

          I’d argue assume is apt as there’s no proof, but there’s sufficient evidence to support acceptance.