• Tb0n3
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They’re not designed for cruelty and murder they’re barriers in the water that’s it. If you have trouble swimming and you drown because you cannot get past the barrier in the water designed to keep you from getting past it, that’s your goddamn fault.

    • VerdantSporeSeasoning@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The blades between the buoys and netting underneath do in fact indicate that they’re designed for cruelty at the bare minimum. Also, the Rio Grande doesn’t just belong to Texas. It’s a federal border with another sovereign nation. Texas can’t just act cruel there unilaterally.

      • Tb0n3
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The "blades"between the bouys are no different than barbed wire, and the nets are obvious to allow marine life to move but keep people from easily swimming under. It’s designed as a barrier and so it includes basic barrier designs.

          • Tb0n3
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If you called it what it is you would be calling it correct. There was no trolling or bigotry. Merely explaining reality.

      • Tb0n3
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They were not saw blades. They’re pointy disks that were intended to prevent people climbing through the low places, and nets designed to allow marine life through but not people are not “designed to entangle”. It was fit for purpose and that purpose was keeping people from illegally crossing the water border. And what fundamental rights? They basically threw their own lives away trying to do something expressly forbidden.