Mexico will almost certainly have its first female president in 2024, after the governing Morena party and the opposition coalition both chose women as their candidates.

Former Mexico City mayor Claudia Sheinbaum was named Morena’s candidate on Wednesday, despite runner-up Marcelo Ebrard’s last-minute denouncement of the process and demand for it to be redone.

Sheinbaum is a climate scientist-turned-politician who was widely believed to be the preferred choice of president Andrés Manuel López Obrador who is unable to run again.

Gálvez is a businesswoman who became a senator in 2018 and has seized media attention with her aspirational story of growing up with an Indigenous father and mestizo mother in Hidalgo state, before working her way through public university and into business and politics.

  • hoshikarakitaridia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t know those two, but the idea of a scientist as president sounds awesome.

    • Mirodir@lemmy.fmhy.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Angela Merkel is a famous example of someone who has a doctorate in quantum chemistry and was a researcher before turning to politics.

      • Chariotwheel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 year ago

        It helped in some cases. E.g. the first thing the government did when faced with Covid was to ask experts and put it into the hand of the RKI with several people familiar with coronaviruses.

        However, in other instances she understood the science and just chose to ignore it because of politics.

        Understanding science is good, but you still need to act accordingly.

        • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          However, in other instances she understood the science and just chose to ignore it because of politics.

          Do you have an example of that? I mean choosing politics over science doesnt immediately screams “wrong” to me

          • Chariotwheel@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nuclear energy.

            She was at first in favour of keeping it, but after Fukushima and subsequent panic in Germany she U-turned and got out of it.

            Now, I am aware that nuclear energy has issues, like the nuclear waste. However, we need something to tide us over until we fully transitioned into renewables and that something is now the shittiest coal we can get, And of course, at this point it’s way too late to reverse it again. We started to build down our nuclear facilities years ago and building them up again would not be worth it.

            However, we should’ve not stopped using nuclear that early in the process of pushing renewable energy.

            Mrs. Merkel was aware, but she rather went with the vox populi of fear of Fukushima.

            • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Nuclear waste is better overall for the environment than coal ash ponds. I live near a coal power plant with those ponds. Not the prettiest sight to see and probably poisoning my local water table. Also, coal produces more nuclear radiation than nuclear power plants do.

            • minorninth@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I agree with you, but politics is complicated. If she felt like continuing to fight for nuclear at that time would be unpopular, it might not have been worth it. It probably would have made it impossible to achieve other goals.

    • ChiwaWithMujicanoHat@mujico.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ideally a scientist would operate politically on the basis of improving society though objective, measurable and honest actions, however Sheinbaum is corrupt as they come, she’s pretty smart but she’s basically sold her soul to her party, which was founded by the current Mexican president, who has been dismantling as many autonomous bodies for checks and balances as well as transparency institutions as he can.

      Sheinbaum is very likely to win since the president has a 2-3 hour live propaganda show almost every morning where he attacks journalists and the opposition and he makes cringe jokes.

      We’ll have to see if once she gets executive power she starts acting for the betterment of society or if she continues following AMLO

      • victron@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re right on the money. She has always failed to distance from AMLO, since he basically appointed her as the Mexico City Mayor to begin with. I really hope, when the time comes, she distances herself from him. Fingers crossed.

    • criticon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The idea sounds great, but this person is not so. She is just a puppet to the current president

    • Greg@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I totally agree, but why would a good scientist stop researching?

      Also we are speaking about real scientists, not the one mentioned in the article.

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What do you mean “real” scientists?

        She has a PhD in energy engineering and physics.

      • Falafels@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        why would a good scientist stop researching?

        Probably when you start to wonder if all your research is for nothing since nobody seems interested in enacting policy grounded in science.

  • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Crazy! Just read this morning that Mexico descriminalized abortion in the whole country and now this! As a Mexican, I am kind of proud.

  • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Did some wikipedia sleuthing on their politics.

    Gálvez seems to have jumped from a conservative right-winger party to a progressive socdem/demsoc (wikipedia lists both) one and is running as an independent.

    Sheinbaums background is in the progressive socdem/demsoc one

    • blujan@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right wing in mexico is not as extreme as the one in the US, though (even then I don’t like them), but what needs to be clear is that although the current party in position is very left (which is great) it’s not really progressive other than in labor areas. I don’t like sheinbaum specifically and I think morena could do better than her or the current president as it has shown from their legislative branch but politics in Mexico right now are very weird.

    • criticon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The current president’s party grew so big that all other opposition parties are allying

  • young_broccoli@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Friendly reminder that having a woman president doesnt mean things will be different, and I really doubt they will.

    For starters, one of them is partially responsible for the colapse of a school causing the death of 26 people and has left México city fall into disrepair for the last 5 years.
    The other one is a demagogue who says she will fix the country because “she is diferent”, following the steps of our current president by fueling the “us vs them” rethoric he started/boosted.

    • admin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m getting Peña Bots vibes from your comment.

      • young_broccoli@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Peña es un pendejo títere del pri que solo vino a calentar la silla.
        Si quieres discutir este tema usa argumentos. Tu intento de insultarme trae una vibra de chayotero

  • Technotica@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh, phew! I first read that as “Mexico to set on fire first female president in 2024” Congrats Mexico. (For the female president, not the imaginary fire)

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Former Mexico City mayor Claudia Sheinbaum was named Morena’s candidate on Wednesday, despite runner-up Marcelo Ebrard’s last-minute denouncement of the process and demand for it to be redone.

    Gálvez is a businesswoman who became a senator in 2018 and has seized media attention with her aspirational story of growing up with an Indigenous father and mestizo mother in Hidalgo state, before working her way through public university and into business and politics.

    In a matter of months Gálvez has risen to become the candidate of a broad opposition coalition that includes the PAN, PRI and PRD, the country’s three oldest mainstream parties.

    Both Sheinbaum and Gálvez were chosen through a series of polls intended to show greater transparency and public participation than in the past, when presidents had the habit of handpicking their successors.

    The opposition coalition never conducted the final consultation of the process it set out, because another candidate, Beatriz Paredes, withdrew, thus handing the candidacy to the frontrunner Gálvez.

    Ebrard’s very public dissent is also an early sign of the trouble Sheinbaum may face to maintain cohesion within the Morena party once López Obrador leaves power.


    The original article contains 712 words, the summary contains 189 words. Saved 73%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Noodle07@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah but are they going to be good presidents? That’s all that matter in the end

  • LanternEverywhere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I heard this same story before in the US in 2016. It doesn’t matter what the polls say, you have to assume that your candidate is actually behind in the race and they’re going to lose unless you do everything you can do right now to help them win.

  • bobman@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just like with hillary, switching up the sex of the president is just a ploy to make people think things will be different.

    They won’t be. Can’t wait to see how cozy these candidates get with the cartel.

    • Bumblefumble@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Women having power is not just a ploy, it’s just something that makes sense since it’s half the candidate pool and they are just as qualified.

      • bobman@unilem.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wish you were right.

        Unfortunately, just having the first woman president is enough to get some people to vote for them.

        • Bumblefumble@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well yeah, because representation and identification matters to people. If you’ve never had female leaders due to bigotry, of course there’s an incentive to push for ones, otherwise gender equality will never establish itself. And it’s not like there aren’t plenty of good female candidates in general, so why not try to actively support one.

          • bobman@unilem.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s fair for people to think that way. It’s just possible for such feelings to be taken advantage of to fool people into thinking there will be change.