Hi there! I’m curently using Pop OS linux as my daily machine to work with. Though sometimes I need to access my Mac Mini M1 and I’m looking on some good way to have remote access to my Mac without getting of my Linux workflow. Both my machines are on same LAN and connected via gigabit connection. I have tried using RustDesk though most issue comes from image quality (I have 4K screen). If you got any sugestion it would be great.

  • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.socialEnglish
    16·
    1 year ago

    Good ole VNC should do the trick. Use VNC server on the Mac and then remmina or KRDC on the Linux machine.

    • Madiator2011@lm.madiator.cloudOPEnglish
      2·
      1 year ago

      I heard that VNC gives bad quality. Also will things like clipboard work fine. Another thing is that I need to be able to access after Mac boots (aka so my mac M1 will be headless with just HDMI dummy plug)

      • just some guy
        9·
        1 year ago

        Iirc macOS Remote Desktop is based on vnc so you should be able to turn it on on your Mac and connect. I use it for managing a headless trashcan

      • _s10e@feddit.de
        8·
        1 year ago

        But sure what you ‘heard’. VNC essentially streams a video from either a real or a virtual screen. This has worked very well for all 2D applications for decades.

        It’s not fancy, does nothing special, and that’s why it works. You need sufficient bandwith for the desired quality, but on LAN you’ll be fine

        What’s usually problematic is fancy UI stuff that relies on a local GPU, which you don’t have. I usually disable animations.

        Disclaimer: Have not used VNC in 10 years.

        Also, many thinks you ask for are out of scope for VNC: clipboard, drag and drop, file access. VNC does none of those; just screen and input (keyboard, mouse, …). Not sure about audio.

        • Rin@lemm.ee
          3·
          1 year ago

          I’ve use tigerVNC daily and it supports clipboard :)

          but you’re right about the other things. no audio too…

      • Lexi Sneptaur@pawb.socialEnglish
        4·
        1 year ago

        It’s good enough for Apple, it should be good enough for you. There is always a quality loss with such things. You’ll have to test it and see if you like it.

      • ShustOne@lemmy.one
        2·
        1 year ago

        VNC would not work for your needs.

        I’ve had success in this set up using TeamViewer (over internet) or No machine (local network).

  • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
    51·
    1 year ago

    Parsec is pretty convenient. I’m still a bit miffed they removed hosting for Linux from their app, along with support for Raspberry Pi clients, but it’s very easy to setup.

  • Kolgeirr
    3·
    1 year ago

    I use NoMachine between windows and Linux and I’m happy with it. According to their site they support MacOS.

  • tvcvt@lemmy.ml
    2·
    1 year ago

    This is a pretty routine workflow for me too. VNC works okay, but there’s some special sauce in the macOS implementation that make it much more responsive Mac to Mac. For Linux to Mac, I waffle between NoMachine and Parsec. Lately I’ve been leaning toward Parsec and it’s a pretty usable experience.

  • GrimSleeper@lemmy.world
    1·
    1 year ago

    I like Chrome Remote Desktop for ease of use and for the ability to get to all of my machines no matter where I am. Great when using Chromebooks, too.

  • Shepy@feddit.uk
    12·
    1 year ago

    Anydesk would be worth a look, and free for none commercial use

  • danielfgom@lemmy.worldEnglish
    24·
    1 year ago

    TeamViewer. I know it’s proprietary but it works well. Just make sure that on Linux you’re using X11, not Wayland as the last time I used it, TeamViewer only supported X11.

    • spaghettiwestern
      1·
      1 year ago

      TeamViewer was breeched several times resulting in remote hacker access to customer machines and all their data. Rather than issuing a mea culpa and advising their customers to immediately change their passwords, the company vehemently denied that their systems had been breached and actually blamed their customers for reusing passwords.

      It took 3 years for these assholes to finally acknowledge that the problem had been caused by them, not their customers.

      Trusting TeamViewer to protect your data and tell you the truth if they are hacked is a mistake.

      https://threatpost.com/teamviewer-denies-hack-blames-password-reuse-for-compromises/118427/