Lately I see a lot of calls do have specific instances defederated for a particular subset of reasons:

  • Don’t like their content
  • Dont like their political leaning
  • Dont like their free speech approach
  • General feeling of being offended
  • I want a safe space!
  • This instance if hurting vulnerable people

I personally find each and every one of these arguments invalid. Everybody has the right to live in an echo chamber, but mandating it for everyone else is something that goes a bit too far.

Has humanity really developed into a situation where words and thoughts are more hurtful than sticks and stones?

Edit: Original context https://slrpnk.net/post/554148

Controversial topic, feel free to discuss!

  • HasturOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not the first time I encountered this and unfortunately I can say: It’s becoming a European thing as well.

    • goat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Americanisation is global.

      • HasturOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let’s accepts this as given, it takes us to the question: Why?

        I mean early globalisation brought us Donutsz McDonald’s, Coke and an obesity pandemic, fine.

        But why and when did this trend start to demand safe spaces everywhere?

        • goat
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are a few different reasons, and it depends on the safespaces. Some safespaces are financially incentivised.

          Really it’s the media people consume. Also doesn’t help that yanks assume everyone they talk to is from their country.