Judge in US v. Google trial didn’t know if Firefox is a browser or search engine::Google accused DOJ of aiming to force people to use “inferior” search products.

  • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    How can anyone make a judgement about something they know nothing about? We are so doomed.

    • atzanteol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      They do so all the time - do you think judges are experts in every thing? The judge needs to understand the law. It’s up to the counsel to ensure they have experts to explain the details.

      • schmidtster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Judges should specialize in certain areas for this exact reason. They should absolutely understand the material as well as the law.

      • snekerpimp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They don’t need to be an expert. They need to be people that have basic knowledge of how the world around them works, and the ability to learn new things as that world changes. I mean that’s the basic requirement at any job I have ever had, why are they exempt?

        • atzanteol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m assuming they asked what it was? Or for clarification? If so, then they learned.

      • 9488fcea02a9
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wasnt there that judge who went and learned programming in order tp preside over a software patents case?

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      As if this has doomed humanity before.

      Judging without knowing has been practically sport for most of humanity’s history.

          • atzanteol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not “fatalistic”, it’s “fine” this way.

            A judge doesn’t have to know what mozilla is before a trial starts. Council can tell them what it is, how/whether it matters to the case, etc.

            It’s the lawyers that have the duty to inform the judge. You can’t rely on every judge knowing everything about all topics. And they don’t really need to…

            • El Barto@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I know what you’re saying, and I understand it. But again, I’m not talking about how I perceive it, but how the other commenter described it (“we’re doomed!”) And like you, I thought it was an overreaction.