• FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    58
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just because someone’s against THIS “vaccine” doesn’t mean they are an ‘antivaxxer’. Lumping everyone together for one view is dangerous.

    • Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes it does.

      There is literally nothing of substance behind the claims that “this one is different” it’s the exact same argument from the exact same unreliable sources. Literally the ONLY difference is that this vaccine was made controversal by American politics.

      If you are against the covid vaccine then you are an anti-vaxxer, whether you realize it or not.

      • DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s not strictly true.

        This was the first FDA-approved mRNA vaccine, so it is “different”.

        Source

        Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine is the first mRNA product to achieve full FDA approval in the U.S.

    • Staccato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The thing is, there are several vaccines for covid available worldwide.

      I’ve never heard an anti-“THIS”-vaccine person ever say “I just don’t want to use mRNA so I want the J&J vaccine” or anything of that nature.

      All I ever heard was lies, pretending covid wasn’t severe or that ivermectin is a protective or that there’s 5G magnetism in the vaccine.