Hundreds of communities around the country will share more than $1 billion in federal money to help them plant and maintain trees under a federal program that is intended to reduce extreme heat, benefit health and improve access to nature.

U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack will announce the $1.13 billion in funding for 385 projects at an event Thursday morning in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. The tree plantings efforts will be focused on marginalized areas in all 50 states as well as Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands and some tribal nations.

“We believe we can create more resilient communities in terms of the impacts of climate,” Vilsack told reporters in previewing his announcement. “We think we can mitigate extreme heat incidents and events in many of the cities.”

  • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s pretty amazing how effective trees are at cooling street temperatures. Also capture some particulates.

    The key is to make sure they are looked after.

    • Swim@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      the key was the plant them 40 years ago, but instead they doubled down and increased densification.

      • alienanimals@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        Density isn’t the problem. It’s a lack of green space (which is possible with density).

        The alternative is more sprawl / single family housing which would generate even more concrete cover and increase surface temperatures.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah not every city needs a Central Park size green space nor do people need lawns for everyone. Trees along the sidewalks, hedges in front of buildings… Look at the rich part of your nearest city. It’s probably fairly dense except for its park, but it’ll be shaded and have room for people to grow some plants on their porch or in front of it or somewhere like that. Space that would otherwise be bare concrete.

          There’s also rooftop gardens but that’s a whole other thing.

      • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’ll be surprised how fast a decent-sized tree can start producing useful shade. Put in something about 6ft and 5 years later it will be making a difference.

  • MisterD@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Nice but it’s a band-aid.

    Prevent the storage of heat in cities.

    • metal roofs
    • light colors (aka No Black)
  • daneBramage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I spent 30 years in Brisbane which has the most green space of any city in the world. My asthma cleared up 3 years after moving there.

    • LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, so we do nothing? Yeah, let’s just wait it out until someone magically invents some perfect solution that we can implement all at once.

      Or… we chip away at the issue until it gets solved. Lots and lots of small fixes that add up… just like how lots and lots of small problems caused the issue in the first place.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s the alternative? There isn’t space for everyone to live in a cottage in the woods. Cities are great for density of people leaving more land to be forests. And I’d love it if cities encouraged and protected natural biome parks, especially cities that were once forested. But also this is the first step that can lead to urban forests