Incorrect AI-generated answers are forming a feedback loop of misinformation online.

  • @[email protected]
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1219 months ago

    Speed running our way to “electrolytes, it’s what plants crave!” I see … if you know, you know.

    • @[email protected]
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      519 months ago

      President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho did seem more entertaining at least then the circus we’ve had for the last few years. At least we can look forward to that?

      Plus Ow! My balls! Does seem like some good tv.

      • fmstrat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        639 months ago

        He was a great president. Saw a problem, admitted his ignorance to it, and hired the smartest person he could find to fix it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            49 months ago

            Hiring special needs, women and letting members of the public rise above their station to become one of the cabinet?

            Sure it’s literally for all the wrong reasons but honestly doesn’t seem any different than now and with less institutional corruption… so… maybe???

          • fmstrat
            link
            fedilink
            English
            39 months ago

            But how do you know they weren’t the best there was? It was bad times you know.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Festering pit of misinformation it is. And yes, they’ll ban you for calling it out or correcting the record.

      • voxel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        i tried to deliberately get a ban there after they refused to delete my account ant i just couldn’t

        • 10EXP
          link
          English
          39 months ago

          I… don’t think they can refuse to delete your account. You could straight up file a GDPR request.

          • voxel
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            yeah gdpr should probably work… the official deletion flow is broken for me

  • Neato
    link
    fedilink
    559 months ago

    You can melt anything. An egg will burn first. Then you will get some type of rendered carbon ash. Which will, eventually, melt and/or vaporize with enough heat.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      46
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Melting is a physical process that changes the form and aggregation state of a thing, but it still remains that thing. Melted gold is still gold, for example.

      Burning on the other hand is a chemical process that leads to new “things”. The egg isn’t longer an egg.

        • radix
          link
          fedilink
          English
          39 months ago

          Water isn’t an element, but it still adheres to these rules.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      459 months ago

      I would argue that it’s no longer ‘egg’ once it’s carbon ash and therefore never melted before it’s existence ended.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      249 months ago

      Well, for eggs, that are carbon based, you will in fact have problems since carbon doesn’t have a liquid state at regular atmospheric pressure. I guess you can add pressure, but is that really what we mean when asking a question if something melt?

      • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        If I simply ask “can eggs melt” and the answer is complicated but still yes, I would hope it to explain the complications and not just say yes. But I mean, if I just wanted a yes or no answer, and it’s technically correct, I’m cool with that. I could always follow up with “how” if the simple answer doesn’t satisfy me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Well, I agree. But what I mean is that when people ask physics questions, it is often implicitly understood to mean under current conditions. You rarely hear normal people or kids (who I find asks most of the physics question) include anything about frictionless vacuums in the question. (For reference: https://xkcd.com/669/ ). So, for the egg question, regular people would most likely consider the answer to be “No, except under very special circumstances”. But, I agree with you that if a simple Yes/No answer is expected, it have to be Yes.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            19 months ago

            Wouldn’t that be true for everything then? 3,400C is pretty special circumstances in my book, yet we say tungsten melts.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 months ago

              I don’t think adding heat is a special circumstance like adding pressure is. It’s very easy to add heat to something. Adding pressure means building a sealed environment to enclose it’s, and some specialized equipment to increase the pressure.

              Adding heat requires that you burn something. That’s it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              Yes, you have a point. However adding heat is often implicit when talking about melting stuff. However, if it requires 3400C, then the answer would probably include a comment about that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      209 months ago

      Eggs are primarily comprised of colloidal suspension.

      Colloids cannot melt, as they are not in a solid phase

    • Troy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      89 months ago

      Which raises an interesting question: what if you cooked it in a zero oxygen environment (say argon, nitrogen, or carbon dioxide… basically welding gases because they’re mostly inert). I can’t burn in that context, so does it melt? Or do you drive off all the volatiles and are just left with carbon anyway?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        If you heat carbon based stuff without oxygen a process called pyrolysis happens. It separates the components into their molecules and molecules into smaller molecules with less weight. During this process you can gain different materials.

        Not sure what kind of products are possible with the pyrolysis of egg + welding gases though lol

        If you heat carbon in a vacuum (via radiation) you can get melted carbon!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          49 months ago

          If you heat carbon in a vacuum, it sublimates straight to gas. If you heat it under extreme pressure in an inert gas atmosphere, then it can melt. Unfortunately creating such pressures in the lab is only possible with diamond anvil presses, which are themselves carbon and thus tend to sublimate from the heat, resulting in pressure vessel failure. Doing the experiment on the surface of a neutron star would work, but presents some other difficulties.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      79 months ago

      In an inert atmosphere under enough pressure pretty much anything can melt without burning.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        69 months ago

        This is the correct answer. In a vaccum wood won’t burn for instance. It will melt, and even sublimate.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      An egg is already liquid, so it can’t be molten. It’s the same way you can’t melt water.

  • voxel
    link
    fedilink
    English
    449 months ago

    well it’s referencing this article now

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    279 months ago

    Had a friend open a conversation line by referencing something on Quora and I immediately tuned out. Quora is a wealth of nonsense.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      389 months ago

      When my daughter was 7 or 8 years old, I caught her answering questions on quora on topics that she knew nothing about. Something to keep in mind.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    279 months ago

    can’t wait till more LLMs and content generators get trained on this garbage data and repeat it all over the internet ad inifinitum.

  • Tammo-Korsai
    link
    fedilink
    259 months ago

    Even when Quora isn’t being ruined with AI, it’s flooded with Neo-Nazis that are self-proclaimed historians.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      129 months ago

      Wtf kind of quora are you reading to find neo Nazi shit? I just find people shilling crypto and bad tech advice.

      • Tammo-Korsai
        link
        fedilink
        39 months ago

        I read a lot of world war two history, so search engines naturally shove such parts of Quora at me. Some are more subtle about being Neo-Nazis, but are defintely pushing the agenda.

  • korok
    link
    fedilink
    English
    149 months ago

    I do sometimes “provide feedback” on terrible featured snippets, but goddamn does it feel like shouting into a void.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      99 months ago

      Ublacklist Firefox plugin.

      Add quota Add pinterest

      Make the internet a little less shit

      You can find some blacklist subs on GitHub too if you want to blanket filter out a lot of the other shit (like alternative.to and other bulk targeted result sites)