Trump makes Bond villains look good by comparison.

  • spaghettiwesternOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    138
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “How’s her husband doing by the way?” and saying a “wall around her house” didn’t do a “good job” of protecting her 82-year-old husband from an intruder who fractured his skull with a hammer during a break-in last year—prompting laughter from the crowd.

    Hillary didn’t go far enough. Trump and his supporters aren’t just deplorable, they’re vile.

    • fiat_lux@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      When I described him in 2016 as a “wannabe Lex Luthor comic-book villain”, someone said I was exaggerating. The truth is that at the time I was somewhat exaggerating. That person made a fair assessment of what was an emotionally-charged reaction to the election results.

      I dislike how accurate the description ended up being.

      Like, who even says this shit for real? And who laughs at it? What even? I can’t understand it at all; and it sort of scares me to know that I might one day randomly encounter someone in power who laughed when he said it.

      • spaghettiwesternOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        IMO no Lex Luthor comic book villain would ridicule a handicap man, say “Why do you bring people like that here? No one wants to see that, the wounded” about a badly disable vet, rape a woman, or brag that he can “Grab them by the pussy”, among a hundred other examples. I’ve never seen or met anyone in my entire life who is as disgusting, obscenely cruel a human being as Trump.

        • Echo@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Go meet a couple more ‘business men’ and ‘CEOs’ you’ll come to find these psychopaths are fairly standard issue capitalists

        • fiat_lux@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Honestly, when I said it, I had a specific image in mind. It seemed just as absurd as the whole situation, and my comparison was more a reflection of that than Luthor’s character.

          Lex Luthor took 40 cakes

          Image description: Entry for the word ‘forty’ from an old Superman-themed children’s illustrated dictionary that uses both the word and numerals. Lex Luthor is running while wearing a hot pink and green super-villain costume of questionable taste. Behind him he pulls a rope attached to a simple yellow four-tier cart of what looks like full 12 inch pies, complete with crusts. The image has a light pink background.
          Text content: Forty. When no one was looking, Lex Luthor took forty cakes. He took 40 cakes. That’s as many as four tens. And that’s terrible.

    • Zeppo
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Deplorable is pretty good. One of the most annoying things was the cretins who didn’t really know what deplorable meant, just they figured out it was meant to be bad, and started calling themselves “proud deplorable!” and so on.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It wasn’t good, no. Using an uncommon word like that made it easier for them to rebrand it than just speaking plainly would have.

        Besides, “half of his supporters are a basket of deplorables” is a horribly inelegant sentence and she’d been in politics more than long enough to know that the right wing echochamber would remove the “half of” part from the collective consciousness and inflate their own numbers to make people believe she was talking about half of the population rather than 9%.

        • Zeppo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean it’s accurate. I do agree that her saying that wasn’t a savvy move.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      She could have called them give people and they would have hated her for it. The problem is maybe that in 2016, the media could still take that and run with it, since that kind of name calling was still fairly new. That and making Hilary run was so stupid, she wasn’t gonna win that kind of media fight