• tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dont do that. The Guardian is a pretty good source. Yes they are alarmist at times, but they’re the last UK newspaper to lick a boot.

          • tetris11@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            The BBC has reported the official line since time immemorial. Their director is now more pro-fascist than ever, but the Guardian is not the mouth-piece of the government as the BBC was, and have had their offices raided numerous times.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Eh, while they are a good publication overall, the Guardian is the definition of permitted dissent.

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      As an American, I really hope that Saudi Arabia crumbles and implodes. It’s a horrible country with horrible leadership and governance.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hope you’re right. They sure have been breaking from the pattern lately, I guess it’s a logical explanation…

    • krolden@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only reason the USA is exporting all that oil is because they don’t have the facilities to refine it.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. The USA has a lot of natural oil reserves, but a lot of them are more expensive to extract than the global average.

        Even with American companies no longer investing in new production, the USA has a lot of oil it has access to extract.

    • zephyreks@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      How has Western equipment fared in the Ukrainian counteroffensive? Last I checked, the Leopard 2 and Challenger were relegated to backline support because they weren’t effective on the offensive and that Ukraine is still struggling with air defence (given that Russia has been tossing around FABs with impunity). The real takeaway from this conflict is that artillery is king and that tanks/planes can’t keep up in development pace with modern interceptors like drones and MANPADS. WW2’s doctrine of large-scale combined arms and blitzkrieg tactics may be a thing of the past.

        • zephyreks@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Stealth is still susceptible to infrared, which is what Ukraine was using to shoot down Russian aircraft at the start of the war.

          If your CAS needs to get into visual range, it’s fucked. If it doesn’t, the usefulness of stealth gets called into question (particularly because, y’know, the entire point of CAS is to have a big bomb to drop on someone, and strapping that to a mounting point ruins your stealth profile).