• Dr. Moose
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1049 months ago

    I’m so disappointed with the global status this shithole maintains. They are spending so much money on bots and propaganda that if you look at Twitter, Tiktok or Instagram it’s full of organic spam and any comments calling out this disgusting place get removed or piled on.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59 months ago

      If it helps, that money is leaving their country which is funded by a natural resource that is losing its economic value and they have nothing economically beyond that, plus will get drilled by climate change which they are responsible for in a lot of ways!

      So, temporary problem :-)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    859 months ago

    How many PGA golfers lined up to join LIV golf sponsored by the Saudi regime? Last year this was Phil Mickelson simping for the Saudi government saying: “I certainly do not condone human rights violations. And addressing what happened to Jamal Khashoggi is awful. But I have seen the good that game of golf has done throughout history. And I really believe that LIV can be good for the game of golf as well.’’

    Money trumps morals.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        209 months ago

        Seeing footballers who’ve spent the last decade preaching to their domestic fans about progressive politics bugger of to Saudi Arabia as soon as the money was better was hilarious. There’s montage that Al Ettifaq put out of Henderson when they brought him, where they went as far as censoring the LGBT armband he’s worn in the Premier League and internationals.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          29 months ago

          Millennial/Gen Z depending on definition here, I did not.

          And after watching it I’m still not convinced it wasn’t an impersonator sketch.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              09 months ago

              An idiot only getting the job because of Daddy’s merits, and it making you realize it really is a club for the wealthy to fuck around in.

              And so far what has been our decision from this nightmare? “Yeah the children of the oligarchs do suck, best to just stick to the ancient old fuckers, cause the original is best!”

  • h3doublehockeysticks [she/her]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    50
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I always find it funny how hung up the media class has been on Keshoggi. Its a fairly intense bit of class solidarity I suppose. Like in terms of pointless and evil acts of the Saudi Arabia state it doesn’t even rank but its seemingly the only thing journalists remember

    • @TimLovesTech
      link
      English
      15
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Probably because in a free from authoritarian government the free press is supposed to be the ultimate checks and balances on personal liberty. When you can’t even write something negative about a leader without being dismembered in a hotel and disposed of in duffle bags like trash, that should be ringing alarms for anyone that isn’t licking boots.

      • @[email protected]M
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        free press is supposed to be the ultimate checks and balances on personal liberty.

        So what does it mean when “free” press is all just owned by rich chucklefucks who have a vested interest in making things as unfree for the working class as possible?

        • @TimLovesTech
          link
          English
          29 months ago

          It means that the alarm bells went off and people paid more attention to capitalism, and voting in people that actively worked against them, because those elected officials treated people they disliked even worse. Then we got a wanna be dictator that went full “journalists are an enemy of the state” because they say mean (TRUE) things about him. Journalists now choose between being able to eat, or sounding the alarm that costs them a job (and falls on deaf ears).

    • @ryathal
      link
      -59 months ago

      Journalists are extremely protective of their own, they really like to believe they are a separate class above the regular people. They go as far as releasing press freedom indexes that include feelings, and penalize not granting them additional rights.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        79 months ago

        Dont do that. The Guardian is a pretty good source. Yes they are alarmist at times, but they’re the last UK newspaper to lick a boot.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            69 months ago

            The BBC has reported the official line since time immemorial. Their director is now more pro-fascist than ever, but the Guardian is not the mouth-piece of the government as the BBC was, and have had their offices raided numerous times.

        • TWeaK
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          Eh, while they are a good publication overall, the Guardian is the definition of permitted dissent.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      79 months ago

      As an American, I really hope that Saudi Arabia crumbles and implodes. It’s a horrible country with horrible leadership and governance.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      19 months ago

      I hope you’re right. They sure have been breaking from the pattern lately, I guess it’s a logical explanation…

    • krolden
      link
      fedilink
      09 months ago

      The only reason the USA is exporting all that oil is because they don’t have the facilities to refine it.

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 months ago

        No. The USA has a lot of natural oil reserves, but a lot of them are more expensive to extract than the global average.

        Even with American companies no longer investing in new production, the USA has a lot of oil it has access to extract.

    • @[email protected]M
      link
      fedilink
      -49 months ago

      How has Western equipment fared in the Ukrainian counteroffensive? Last I checked, the Leopard 2 and Challenger were relegated to backline support because they weren’t effective on the offensive and that Ukraine is still struggling with air defence (given that Russia has been tossing around FABs with impunity). The real takeaway from this conflict is that artillery is king and that tanks/planes can’t keep up in development pace with modern interceptors like drones and MANPADS. WW2’s doctrine of large-scale combined arms and blitzkrieg tactics may be a thing of the past.

        • @[email protected]M
          link
          fedilink
          09 months ago

          Stealth is still susceptible to infrared, which is what Ukraine was using to shoot down Russian aircraft at the start of the war.

          If your CAS needs to get into visual range, it’s fucked. If it doesn’t, the usefulness of stealth gets called into question (particularly because, y’know, the entire point of CAS is to have a big bomb to drop on someone, and strapping that to a mounting point ruins your stealth profile).

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    89 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Since then, Mohammed bin Salman – Saudi Arabia’s crown prince and de facto ruler, who, according to US intelligence officials, approved Khashoggi’s assassination – has managed a near complete rehabilitation of his increasingly autocratic regime.

    Prince Mohammed has met with Joe Biden, Emmanuel Macron and other world leaders; he’s positioning Saudi Arabia as a global tourism destination; and he’s plowing ahead with plans to build Neom, his $500bn futuristic city in the desert.

    Trump dropped the pretense that the US-Saudi alliance is anything more than a transactional arrangement based on keeping global oil prices stable, common security interests in the Middle East, and negotiating large weapons deals.

    After Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine in February 2022, disrupting global oil markets, the prince seized his opportunity to pressure Biden into becoming a supplicant seeking lower gasoline prices for American consumers.

    Then last October, as the world braced for a surge in fuel prices due to the Ukraine war and sanctions against Russian oil, the Saudi-led Opec Plus cartel decided to cut production by 2m barrels a day – the opposite of what Biden administration officials had pleaded with the Saudis to do.

    After the shock of that embarrassing announcement, which threatened to raise gas prices around the US midterm elections, Biden vowed: “There’s going to be some consequences for what they’ve done.” Yet, a few months later, the US administration quietly dropped any pretense of holding Prince Mohammed and his regime accountable.


    The original article contains 1,260 words, the summary contains 240 words. Saved 81%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Putin taught Kim Jong, who taught MBS, who taught Modi. When one or two civilians lives are an acceptable compromise to retain a relationship with another country, you open up that route for all.

    Edit: The triggered tankies from Hexbear just soothe my soul. Cry more.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -19 months ago

    Just wondering what you think, didn’t Jamal Khashoggi write articles defending Hisbullah and other terrorist orgs that Saudis didn’t like? I am not justifying the actions of SA, but just wondering here.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      229 months ago

      People who talk of the west as fascist must not know much of what’s going on in the east or eastern history.

      • @mindbleach
        link
        59 months ago

        ‘This is bad.’

        ‘No, another thing is bad.’

        Right, sorry, only one problem allowed at a time.

        • @Gorilladrums
          link
          29 months ago

          Calling something Fascist when it is very clearly and objectively not Fascist does not actually make it Fascist. The West isn’t Fascist. The point he was trying to make is that people like you have a world of view so narrow and ignorant that you don’t understand what Fascism is, hence the incorrect usage. A country like Azerbaijan or Turkmenistan are Fascist, a country like Germany or the Netherlands are not.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            39 months ago

            there’s a 99.99% probability you are sending this comment from a chinese piece of hardware your government is totally fine importing from china

            • @Gorilladrums
              link
              09 months ago

              China barely produces hardware, unless someone is specifically buying a product from a Chinese company. A lot of hardware isn’t even manufactured in China anymore, let alone designed and engineered.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      119 months ago

      By that standard the only countries not monstrous are those too feeble to ally with.

      Plenty of countries on all continents have sided with oppressive regimes, and conveniently ignored atrocities as long as they’re aimed at someone else. In anything from the Korea or Pakistani wars, to genocides in Central America, to slave trading within the African continent.

      The West is due some criticism, but this approach is useless.

      • @[email protected]M
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        America itself has been an oppressive regime. Britain and France were both oppressive regimes not too far in the past (and still to some degree today).

        Why are people surprised that oppressive regimes ally themselves with other oppressive regimes? Geopolitics isn’t a story of “good” and “bad,” it’s a story of rational self-interest.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      89 months ago

      If freedom of press is one of the ways you can assess how fascist a state is, which it is, then I wonder which countries you consider better than the west. China? Russia? North Korea? Yeah, all places renown for not silencing journalists, poisoning political opponents or ruling with an iron fist. All places where you can just criticize the government, publicly, on prime TV, in the journals, without repercussions.

      Also all places where they don’t murder people for their political views, where they don’t incarcerate them, torture them, send them to “re-education camps” or try to genocide entire ethnic groups in order to reduce dissent.

      At the end of the day, “the west” remains the only place where you can actually go on tv, in the squares and protest against the government decisions, criticize them and even vote for the government to leave power. Is it perfect? Hell no, it’s a disgusting system rigged by the rich and powerful, but it’s still miles ahead of any totalitarian, authoritarian dictatorship.

      Also it’s not like China isn’t buying lots of oil from Iran, a country which it’s as much a savage murderous regime as Saudi Arabia, and from Russia, an imperialistic warmongering nation. And the reason it’s clear, they need energy as much as the west needs energy. It’s the reason why everyone puts up with those kinds of people.

      The sooner we, as a species, can move away from oil, coal, gas and the likes, the better it will be for everyone. No more energy wars and a cleaner planet overall.

      • @[email protected]M
        link
        fedilink
        -19 months ago

        How much good has your criticism of the government done?

        Do you have affordable housing? Are your healthcare needs covered? Is your taxpayer money going to help improve your life? Is the homeless issue solved? Has your government avoided going to war? Has your government fixed the rampant racial inequality in the prison system?

        I say this like it’s to an American, but really it applies to most Western countries.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          89 months ago

          Well, some of those point have improved in some countries of the western block. Not everyone is American btw. And I’m not saying the west is perfect, but when making a statement like “this is why the west is the worst” you also need to tell me who is better.

          Lots of these issues are extremely present in other non-western countries as well and even more so. Or are you telling me that outside of western countries everyone else has affordable housing, free, good and available healthcare, a good and fair justice system, no racial inequality and no wars?

          • @[email protected]M
            link
            fedilink
            29 months ago

            Sure, I’m not denying that conditions aren’t perfect, but the argument being made is that having a democracy influences government policy to align with citizens’ interests.

            Looking at per-capita wealth, the West should be doing much better on these key issues under the assumption that the government exists to make people’s lives better.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Who is doing so much better though? It seems like most countries have similar issues and it’s not really a West vs East thing. Costa Rica seems like one of the nicer places to live in the world right now, but it’s a “Western” country and it’s also tiny.

          I look at Eastern countries like Korea and Japan and see a ton of problems with workers being abused and authoritarian legal systems. Better than the US in some ways but worse in others. I would rather live in the US despite the worse healthcare cause I don’t want to work 12 hours a day.

          • @[email protected]M
            link
            fedilink
            -19 months ago

            US labour law exists in spite of democracy, not because of it. Also, I think it’s hard to argue that Korea and Japan aren’t Western democracies (in that, they value Western democratic ideals and structure their governments around the Western concept of democracy).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          69 months ago

          Russia does the same to countries in their sphere of influence who even think about approaching the west. I’m looking at Georgia, Moldavia and now Ukraine. Also they really like to meddle in Africa and the middle east through PMCs like Wagner, prop up local dictatorships and harvest labor and natural resources for themselves.

          China is also trying their hand at the imperialistic game, although they are newer at it. They are trying to enter many African countries and stationing there Private Security Companies (which are paramilitaries still controlled by the Chinese government, because of course they are). In Asia they are also trying to increase their influence. In the South China Sea they are trying to claim other nations exclusive economic zones as their own while in the Indian Ocean they are trying to secure military ports by forcing 99 years leases (similar to the British lease on the port of Hong Kong). I believe this plan is called the string of pearls and I also believe Indians consider it a way of encircling them (China-Pakistan corridor, China-Myanmar corridor and in the ocean ports in Cambodia, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Djibouti and the Mauritius).

          Let’s say that all major powers have tried and keep trying their hand at imperialism. The only difference is that the US has a much bigger economic power than Russia and has been playing the game for a lot longer than modern China

    • @Gorilladrums
      link
      -29 months ago

      This is a brain dead take because it’s just guilt by association. Having diplomatic relations with countries around the world doesn’t mean that you endorse or support their government. A country that’s ruled by a shitty ideology like Fascism or Marxism is something to be weary of, but these countries do in fact exist and they do play a role in global politics and economics. For example, the UAE and Israel normalizing relations doesn’t mean that they support each other, but they recognize each other’s influence and understand that diplomacy and cooperation is more beneficial and productive than shunning each other.

      I mean we tried to sanction, shun, and ignore authoritarian countries like Cuba and North Korea for decades… How has that worked out for us? My point is that we can’t cut relations with every country we don’t like. There are situations where that should be the case and there are definitely arguments for us to be more cautious when dealing with these types of regimes, but we can’t cut ourselves off from the vast majority of the world (which is authoritarian) nor can we force countries to adopt our ways (we tried with Iraq and Afghanistan, it didn’t work).