I know we’re living in the crapsack timeline, but I didn’t realize it was a crapsack made of little shit people that the Republicans sculpted like they were Play-Doh and then threw them in the sack and made screaming noises, pretending the little shit people were screaming, before declaring that sack to be their new second-in-command after Trump.

    • abff08f4813c@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, specific to the role of Speaker, he’s disqualified due to having been indicted of felonies with a term of more than two years.

      • Jimbob0i0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Technically that’s just a GOP rule… and we know what their reaction is to things like that…

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      He shoild be, but so far the courts so far have disagreed, and the SCOTUS declined to hear the case until more lower courts have ruled. Until he’s convicted, it’s unlikely that he will be pre-emptively disqualified from holding office.

      • YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Constitution does not state the individual has to be convicted. They only had to aid in any way, shape, or form an insurrection, which he did.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree with you, but so far the courts have not. Remember that the courts consist of judges who may or may not have allegiances or prejudices that influence their reading of the constitution. So while we can agree we both think Trump should be disqualified by the letter of the law, we cannot know for sure that he will be disqualified. If he is convicted of seditious conspiracy, then the pathway becomes much clearer.

          • GreenBottles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If he’s convicted on almost ANY of those 91 indictments on his shoulders, he’s basically eligible for the rest of his life in prison. There’s A LOT of serious charges there. I want to say most carry a 10 year minimum on the low end and 20+ on the high. So… changes are he isn’t getting away with anything here imo.

            • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Except not all of those charges disqualify him from holding office, and there’s nothing preventing him from running from prison. Then what happens next? What if he wins? It’s not really that far fetched to imagine. I agree, I think it’s unlikely, but I didn’t think it was likely Hillary would shit the bed in 2016, either. So here we are.

              • GreenBottles@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                but you’re making a big assumption that the middle of the road folks out there are going to vote for dude in prison which just isn’t going to happen

                • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Anyone that voted for Trump twice is nowhere near the middle of the road. It’s alarming how many of them exist, but that’s our reality. You’re making a big assumption that Trump voters will suddenly be reasonable despite all evidence to the contrary.

        • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          A conviction would generally be seen as what establishes the fact that the person has done that act.

          Which is probably for the best. I’d remind you that plenty of Americans right now would say that Biden has committed treason of some kind, so it’s probably a good thing that there’s a formal legal process for this.