• PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Israel is partly to blame for supporting Hamas to undermine Fatah. And, of course, for the general tension caused by the occupation and blockade.

    Simultaneously, Israeli civilians should not be the victims, and their blood remains on Hamas’s hands.

    Both things are true. Though I somehow doubt the Saudis and Iran are out here condemning the rise of Hamas.

      • PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Honestly, once Hamas was ascendant, I don’t think even stopping the killing of Palestinian civilians would’ve prevented further terrorist attacks. Like, the last serious chance for peace in the near-future was when Fatah was the only game in town and willing to negotiate. That opportunity was wasted because the Israeli establishment thought they could play divide and conquer and squeeze a better deal out of the already-oppressed.

        • scarabic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You make good points and I’m not disagreeing but just think about it for a second: what a huge change it would require for Israel to stop killing Palestinian children. It would take a massive and concerted effort, policy changes, deployment changes, and an amount of care and restraint the world has never seen.

          I think it would change Israel 110% if they absolutely, positively had to stop killing children. Everything they do is fundamentally built around it. So really stopping it actually might change everything.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They didn’t know how good they had it with Fateh. But hey they fucked around and are finding out. Yassar Arafat is laughing in his grave.

  • FatLegTed@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    When you treat people like shit for years, don’t be surprised if they fight back.

    Israel has constantly held these people under the heel. Which is a bit rich when you think about all the wringing hands and what have you when anyone mentions the holocaust and the hard time Jews got in Europe before WWII.

    I used to think Israel was the hard done by party here, over the last 30 odd years I’ve come to realise Israel are not the shining example of perfection they’d like us all to believe.

      • Deceptichum@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        1 year ago

        Israel has been going after Palestinian civilians for decades.

        So you also admit Israel is a terrorist state and that they have zero credibility?

        • jscummy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you have specific instances of Israel actually targeting civilians when they’re not being used as human shields? They’ve bombed civilian buildings, but usually because Hamas uses those buildings to house weapons. And with roof knocking/alerts, they are at least making some effort to limit collateral damage

          • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            They just pointed out how using your logic neither side has any credibility due to their subjugation and murdering of innocent civilians.

            The events of the past are not relevant when the events of the current are beyond the boundaries of what’s acceptable to the rest of humanity.

            Except in this case both parties actively go beyond the boundaries of what’s acceptable to the rest of humanity

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Also that “events of the past” vs “events of the current” dichotomy is just some S-tier mental gymnastics. It’s all in the past. The Hamas attack, Israel’s more recent attack that also killed loads of civilians. If you know about the event, then it’s already happened. That’s just how time works.

              They’re just choosing some arbitrary point in the past to start counting so they can claim one side is the victim and the other are the terrorists, but they’re pretending to have some objective basis for it although that falls down the moment you look at it.

              • Dkarma@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well let’s go all the way back then. What does the Israelis own history say vis a vis the Bible / Torah? Oh yeah it says the cannaanites were there first and the only claim they have to that land is literally " we know u were here but god told us this is ours"

      • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean are you suggesting that it would be a better tactic for hamas to engage in pitched battles with the IDF? Come on. If we accept that they have the right to fight we’re gonna have to come to terms with the fact that they are not in a position to engage in peer vs peer combat. Everything they do will be asymmetrical.

        • Deceptichum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly the fact that neither side has stood in an honourable square formation and shot musket laden volley after volley into each other says a lot about how barbaric they are.

        • jscummy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think you understand what asymmetrical warfare means, it usually doesn’t involve massacring and torturing civilians for zero strategic gain. That’s just terrorism

            • jscummy
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Assymetric warfare would generally include targets of some military value. There’s some overlap but calling this justified in any way is just providing cover for Hamas to do whatever they want.

              If you want to argue honestly, Hamas has done nothing but exploit and screw over the Palestinian people. They’ve destroyed any future for Gaza and caused their own people to die, again and again.

              • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                How is me explaining that the idea of engaging in pitched battles anywhere close to me justifying fucking anything, or propping up hamas. Like most zionists you are completely incapable of actually engaging.

  • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    While the creation of Israel on already-peopled land is obviously the “original sin” of this conflict, at this point both groups believe that their existence is at stake and neither are just going to go away or surrender. There will never be peace between them.

    In Punic Nightmares, Dan Carlin quotes an ancient proverb to the effect that a war is not over until the losing side admits defeat. That is why the Allies in WW2 insisted on unconditional surrender from Germany and Japan. Maybe the Israelis and Palestinians need to fight it out until one side surrenders unconditionally and accepts the other as the legitimate government.

    • Krono@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Fight it out until one side surrenders unconditionally” my dude you are out here calling for millions of deaths, you can’t be serious. Genocide is not the only path to peace.

      Maybe listen to Dan Carlin’s “Logical Insanity” episode to get an idea of how your proposed solution would spiral out of control.

      • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not calling for genocide. You made that up and should apologize. Did the Allies genocide Germany and Japan? No, they did not.

        Obviously, war is horrific. Israel and Palestine have been in a low-level war for many decades now. No peace plan, foreign mediation, or negotiation has settled it. What’s your genius solution that no one else in the world has thought of?

        • Krono@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          My preferred solution is not novel or genius, it is the international consensus: A two state settlement on the international border (green line) with mutually agreed upon land swaps. This is the solution with consistant and overwhelming international support, just look at the UN votes on the subject over the past 5 decades.

          Unfortunately due to their overwhelming military superiority, Israel will not agree to this in the short term. This military superiority is a gift from the world superpower: having a client state in the middle east is very valuable to US economic interests. This is why you often see votes in the UN with a result of something like 161-2 (Israel + US vs. the rest of the world).

          So I believe the larger question is how to stop the United States military industrial complex. And I’m sorry but I don’t have a solution for that. Just like we are willing to fight Russia to the last Ukranian life, we are willing to turn a blind eye to Palestinian death as long as Israel keeps spending billions a year on helicopters, tankers, naval guns, and so much more.

          • stifle867@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think the point they were trying to make is that this solution is great in theory, but due to the reasons you have pointed out does not actually work in practice. What happens in practice is everything that has led us to this point. They were not intentionally calling for genocide IMO, but misguidedly floating the idea of a less protracted end to the conflict.

            • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I think there was a failure to demonstrate that lack of protraction and I think glossing over the allies dropping two atomic bombs on Japan and killing half a million people speaks to the weakness in justifying it with that comparison.

              That’s not to say there’s no substance to it at all, but this isn’t the right case for it.

        • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The Allies definitely genocided the Germans. It’s not popular to talk about but between the Russian advancement and the massive displacement projects following the war it would be disingenuous to not call it ethnic cleansing.

          Edit: apparently downvoters don’t think displacing millions, leading to the deaths of millions, based on their ethnicity, isn’t ethnic cleansing. Okay

    • kaitco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is no surrendering here. You’re talking about a region where these “two” peoples have been fighting for three thousand years. If they were capable of sharing or conceding, they might have found a way to manage in the last couple millennia.

      Israel feel like it’s their rightful land, which can be up for debate depending on who you are, but Muslims in the area also feel that it is their rightful land. Israel refuses to share the land, but then can you blame them when the Muslims (particularly Hamas) have a goal of eradicating them. I’m black and that’s much like asking me to “just get along” with the Nazis next door who constantly advocate for the US to be a white ethnostate. On the flip side of that, is it fair for me to completely segregate anyone who doesn’t look like me or worship like me just because there’s an amount of “them” who might be Nazis?

      There’s a way that they could both live in the land, but it’s going to take a major change in leadership (seriously, why is Netanyahu still there?) and a change in the minds for “both” sides that accepts that either they share or they’ll both be destroyed in the end.

      • Jonna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, until the rise of the modern Zionist movement, there wasn’t a lot of sectarian conflict. (Well, since the Crusades.) There are Palestinian Jews(and Christians) that were living in British Palestine. 1927 coin in English, Arabic, and Hebrew https://www.etsy.com/listing/1538377183/1927-and-1942-palestine-2-mils-israel?gpla=1&gao=1&=&utm_custom1=_k_c2d52efd97041940710b4bded98150ab_k_&utm_custom2=319339185&msclkid=c2d52efd97041940710b4bded98150ab

      • stifle867@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The way that most civilized nations have multiple peoples living under the same nation is a clear seperation of church and state. What Muslim is going to live under Jewish rule? What Jew is going to live under Muslim rule? Or even if the split the land down the middle and run each side independently, there is still the threat of conflict.

        Theoretically they should be able to live under one nation as long as the state passes no laws that prohibit religious freedom. Works for the rest of the world.

      • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I actually largely agree with you, including the fact that Netanyahu is a turd, but I think you are wrong that there is a way for these two states to live on the same land.

        The end-point that most experts say is inevitable is a two-state solution with both sides agreeing on the others’ right to exist. So, how do we get there? Well, why did Germany and Japan surrender at the end of WW2 rather than continue to fight forever? What would recreate the conditions that allowed WW2 to end?

        At the end of the day, Israelis and Palestinians need two things: first, they both need somewhere viable to live under their own government, and second, they both need to be so sick of war that they are willing to compromise. Neither side is anywhere near that point.

        Some people just reflexively say no to war, no matter what. However, since you brought it up, the black experience in the US is actually appropriate to raise. The US did, in fact, fight a civil war to end slavery, and it was the most intense conflict the US has ever fought. Without protracted suffering, I do not believe that Israel or Palestine will summon up the willpower to choose better leaders and compromise. Do you disagree?

        • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Could you give me a source on your assertion of a two state solution? I’ve very rarely seen any actual geopolitical experts suggest it. It almost always comes from the Israelis. Palestinians by and large are adamant that there needs to be a single state. I mean, of course they are. How would some embassies help anything.

        • filister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          One might argue that WW2 might have not happened if Germany was treated better after the Versailles treaty.

          So you can’t really expect a reconciliation while you treat your neighbour like in an open air prison.

        • kaitco@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh they absolutely will both experience extreme suffering as this drags on and on.

          I think the likely conclusion is that the US will unfortunately put troops on the ground and settle it; maybe just temporarily.

          But you’re very right that they all need to be sick of war, and I don’t think that either “side” is there yet because it hasn’t really been a full-scale war since the 1940s.

      • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The region was nowhere near this unstable until this century. This started with the partition of the Ottoman Empire and the gift of Palestine to the political zionists.

      • AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Imagine thinking that valuing retaking your stolen family home and not being held as a stateless citizen in an open air concentration camp is somehow not caring about your life. The fucking privilege in that comment.

    • SARGEx117@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hamas represents all Palestinians the way Israel and the IDF represent all jews.

    • Jonna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      FWIW, Hamas won the last election that the Palestinian Authority held in 2006 (!) Fatah pretty much kept the West Bank, denying Hamas the victory, but couldn’t stop Hamas from taking over in Gaza. My understanding of PA politics was that negotiation with Israel was seen as a dead end and that any party with negotiations as a primary tactic was going to lose. And Israel is responsible for that perception.

    • jscummy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hamas was elected in 2006 but has held on to power since. A poll from a few years back showed 52% support still, but I would hope that’s had a steep crash now

  • AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, they aren’t the only ones. A lot of people, including myself, say that. The better part of a century of oppression, and people are surprised that Palestinians are turning to a fundamentalist religious group to save them? You can only poke a cornered animal for so long before it turns and attacks you. I’ve got no sympathy for Israel, and I wish nothing but misery on them.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The governments of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Iran appeared to back Hamas in its escalating conflict with Israel on Saturday.

    The Palestinian militant group launched a mass attack on Israeli forces and settlements, killing at least 100 people in Israel and about 200 in Gaza early Saturday.

    While leaders in the U.S. and Europe quickly denounced the attack and gave support for Israel, the three Middle Eastern nations criticized the country over its treatment of Palestinians.

    “The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is closely following the developments of the unprecedented situation between a number of Palestinian factions and the Israeli occupation forces, which has resulted in a high level of violence on several fronts there,” the country’s Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the conflict a “war” in a public address early Saturday.

    The U.S. has vowed to support Israel, with Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin saying the government will ensure the country “has what it needs to defend itself.”


    The original article contains 425 words, the summary contains 164 words. Saved 61%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • CookieJarObserver
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see three dictatorships being pro terrorism in a Democracy…

    Pretty obviously the Democracy wins.

  • trainsaresexy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Without a doubt another step closer to WW3.

    Here’s hoping China doesn’t attempt to invade Taiwan this decade with all this other shit going on.