Again, if what are you are writing about was the content of the article and how the article was presented, it would it be a good article.
Instead, it’s some coy vulture shaking their head and demanding everyone stare at the pop culture dunce of the day who has removed himself from spotlight because he knew the vultures were descending.
You’ve written more relevant content in your post and presented said content more genuinely than this article has done with thousands of words.
That’s not what you’re arguing in your original comment. “Ugh It’s helping kids!” has nothing to do with the author, and everything to do with the subject.
Again, if what are you are writing about was the content of the article and how the article was presented, it would it be a good article.
Instead, it’s some coy vulture shaking their head and demanding everyone stare at the pop culture dunce of the day who has removed himself from spotlight because he knew the vultures were descending.
You’ve written more relevant content in your post and presented said content more genuinely than this article has done with thousands of words.
That’s not what you’re arguing in your original comment. “Ugh It’s helping kids!” has nothing to do with the author, and everything to do with the subject.
Yes, that perfectly halfway reiterates the intent of my original comment.
Hang on…everyone… they’re clapping! Cheering.
You’ve done it.
Warmsoda reading comprehension? Satisfactory.