I am using duplicati and thinking of switching to Borg. What do you use and why?

  • Fryboyter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    There is no such thing as the objectively best solution. Each tool has advantages and disadvantages. And every user has different preferences and requirements.

    Personally, I am using Borg for years. And I have had to restore data several times, which has worked every time.

    In addition to Borg, you can also look at Borgmatic. This wrapper extends the functionality and makes some things easier.

    And if you want to use a graphical user interface, you can have a look at Vorta or Pika.

    • privsecfoss@feddit.dkOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Agree. Should say ‘best for you’. Cool thanks. I know of Vorta which I intended of using. Gonna read up on the other ones.

  • CjkOvPDwQW@lemmy.pt
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    Using borg backup, just because there are some nice frontends for the gnome ecosystem (when I am using gnome, I love to use gnome apps), and it has a nice cmd for scripting when using something else (using it on servers)

  • flux@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Kopia has served me great. I back up to my local Ceph S3 storage and then keep a second clone of that on a raid.

    Kopiahas good performance and miltiple hosts can back up tp it concurrently while preserving deduplication – unlike borgbackup.

    • aliens@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Kopia has been working great for me as well. It’s simple, versatile and reliable. I previously used Duplicati but kept running into jobs failing for no reason, backup configurations missing randomly and simple restores taking hours. It was a hot mess and I’m happy I switched.

      • Parsnip8904@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I want to love kopia but the command line syntax feels unnatural to me. I don’t know why either. For the whole month I test drove it, I had to look up every single time how to do something. Contrast this with restic which is less featureful in some ways but a few days in it felt like I was just using git.

        • aliens@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I never used the command line with Kopia besides starting it up in server mode and used the web based GUI to configure, it was pretty simple to get everything setup that way. You may want to give it another try using Kopia in that mode.

  • I_Am_Jacks_____@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve been using restic. It has built-in dedup & encryption and supports both local and remote storage. I’m using it to back up to a local restic-server (pointing to a USB drive) and Backblaze B2.

    Restores for single or small sets of files is easy: restic -r $REPO mount /mnt Then browse through the filesystem view of your snapshots and copy just like any other filesystem.

  • Karce@wizanons.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I use btrfs snapshots and btrbk

    btrfs is a great filesystem and btrbk complements it easily. Switching between snapshots is also really easy if something goes wrong and you need to restore.

    Archwiki docs for btrfs: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Btrfs#Incremental_backup_to_external_drive

    Of course you’d still want a remote location to backup to. You can use an encrypted volume with cloud storage. So google drive, etc all work.

  • flatbield@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I am old school. I just use GNU Tar with the Pax format and multiple external detachable encypted hard drives. Reason is it is simple and a well known tool that is very common with a standard archive format.

  • Klaymore
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I use NixOS so all my system configuration is already saved in my NixOS configs, which I save on GitHub. For dotfiles that aren’t managed by NixOS I use syncthing to sync them between my devices, but no real backup cause I can just remake them if I need to, and things like my Neovim and VSCode configs are managed by my NixOS configs so they’re backed up as well.

      • Klaymore
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Yeah I have a full impermanence setup using tmpfs, which is really nice. I did it like on the NixOS wiki and it’s been helpful for organizing my dotfiles and keeping track of all the random stuff that programs put everywhere.

        I actually have all my stuff in a separate /stuff folder kinda by accident so my /home only has dotfiles and things like that.

  • derek@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago
    • Btrfs for local system backups based on snapshots
    • Photoprism for photos
    • Syncthing for other media
    • flux@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      You will reconsider calling strategy a backup should the filesystem get corrupted for whatever reason.

      I’ve tested my full system backup restore once with btrfs. Worked out fine.

      • derek@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Maybe Photoprism isn’t a backup strategy, but Syncthing for sure is, because you can have multiple backup units in it.

        I’m additionally use software RAID on one of devices, that receives Syncthing backups.

  • mrmanager@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I don’t have backups. :/

    And I will regret it some day.

    I use github for code so that’s backed up though.

  • professed@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I started using Timeshift when it was included with a distro I was using and haven’t had reason to shift away from it. Have already used it once to do a full restore.

  • JohannesOliver@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Multiple. Locally I have Timeshift doing btrfs snapshots every so often. This is mostly to roll back to a snapshot if something breaks. I’ve never had to use it (and probably should).

    I use Pika backup every once in a while for a local backup to an external drive. Mostly because it’s easy to restore quickly.

    I have duplicacy doing backups to a cloud provider. I used to use duplicati for this, and it was fine - although I didn’t like that it seems to be forever in beta. I like that duplicacy can do deduplication between backups of different machines which most other solutions I’ve seen cannot. I like its selection of cloud providers vs Borg/Vorta and some others.

  • isosphere@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m currently working on a disaster recovery plan using fsarchiver. I have very limited experience with it so far, but it had the features and social proof I was looking for.

    I have so far used it to create offline filesystem backups of two volumes, one was LUKS encrypted (has to be manually “opened” with cryptsetup).

    It can backup live filesystems which was important to me.

    It’s early days for my experience with this, but I’m sure others have used it and might chime in.