• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I posted it 4 hours ago now and thankfully, it only seems like we have a couple of bigots. That’s pretty good for the internet.

    • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I love that I refreshed the front page to find this meme at the top with “-2 new comments” but at least the whole thread hasn’t been nuked.

      Nice work mods, let’s keep hateful comments to a minimum while still encouraging healthy discussion with people that might honestly not know better.

      • DreamButt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol. My only regret is not taking a screenshot of that one guy getting destroyed by like 20 different research papers

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          He ignored those and kept replying the same nonsense to everyone else. Looks like he got hammered by a mod.

      • Wergul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s sad that all replies (especially positive, helpful ones) are automatically deleted too. They shouldn’t be.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    When the gay marriage vote came to Australia, my household got very political. I voted yes, but both of my dads voted no.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I never understood the gays who voted no on a referendum back in the 2000s and justified it with some religious and heteronormative bs like “marriage is from religion by religion” and “we’re the outliers, so we shouldn’t make people conform to us”. Like, how self-hating and backstabbing can you be. If you don’t want it, you don’t have to have it but let others realize their dreams at nobody’s expense.

      • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I do agree that marriage is a religious thing and I wouldn’t care at all, but getting married brings a lot of benefits.

        So its not like gay people want to “realize their dreams” but we want the same benefits that straight people have.

        If religious people dont want to accept gay people, then benefits shouldn’t be given based on religious acts like marriage.

        • Throwdownyourgrandma@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          Marriage is not religious. Getting married in a church, with a priest and before God is the religious part.

          In a lot of countries you can get married without any religion being involved. Some government officials will then officiate the wedding.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 year ago

            Even true in the religious U.S., even in ultra-religious Indiana. My wife and I got married by a lawyer (a very old family friend) in a ballroom. We said we didn’t want any mention of god or religion and he complied. This was 23 years ago, but it hasn’t changed.

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I only meant “realize their dreams” in the sense that some people want it as part of their life goals. I personally don’t want it and couldn’t care less but I still want that possibility for others.

  • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why is everyone complaining about child grooming lately? I get my dog groomed once a month and the first couple days of her smelling nice is the best. Do you all just like dirty kids?

    Hopefully unnecessary but, /s

    • Fr❄stb☃️te@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      How else am I supposed to get my kid looking like a million dollar man? Good looks come with good grooming! Especially the blonde flowing locks!

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s like pulling teeth to get my daughter to brush her hair. And she has beautiful curly hair. It gets all matted in the back. She’s 13. Shouldn’t she care?

      • Droechai@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you check for “silk spray” for Yorkshire terriers it’s great for painless matt and tangle extractions, and Yorkie fur is quite similar to human hair.

        A small tip for those rare events when the brush gets used, and will help with speed and pain

  • Artyom@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 year ago

    When I was in middle school pretty much every teacher in the school was in one big lesbian menage a trois. Everyone knew it, and they would all cycle through being roommates with each other. Last I checked, there wasn’t an unusual amount of gay alumni. On an unrelated note, we also learned important skills like critical thinking and understanding the world we lived in, turns out that mattered quite a bit more in my life so far.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      That sounds absolutely hilarious. The closest I ever got to that was spotting a middle school teacher years later at a Pride festival. He did not remember me and I was too shy to go talk to him. I had the hunch that he was gay but it would’ve meant a lot to me if he were out during that time. Oh well, he was a great teacher regardless.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was an open secret that my high school French teacher was gay. He pretty much couldn’t hide it. He would have made MAGA boomer gaydars go off. But at the time, you would get fired if you were openly gay and a teacher in Indiana. It was so fucking stupid. Everyone just turned a blind eye to it. He clearly loved his job and wanted to do it for the rest of his life, but how sad that he had to hide a key part of himself just to do it. I’m not sure if he’s still teaching- I don’t even remember his name over two decades later- but if he is, I hope he’s happily married to his then incredibly hot boyfriend (I’m not gay but he was so hot, I might consider it). I only knew about the boyfriend after graduating and running into them a couple of years later. I guess unlucky in his job but extremely lucky in love.

  • eee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is this how conservatives homophobes try to play the victim here? “Oh we’re in the minority now, let’s pretend we need to come out”?

  • Fr❄stb☃️te@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d always say “I sit there and listen to my teachers talk about their sex life” as a joke when someone asked me how my day was back then, I didn’t think it’d turn into reality.

  • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    As an aside, when I was a rather innocent pre teen, I was into hair metal of the 1980s, and liked the Motley Crue song Girls, Girls, Girls. I didn’t know what menage a trois meant though…so I asked my French teacher.

    One of my dumbest moments but honestly I really didn’t know and it seemed reasonable to ask the person who knew French.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      My school had a Latin teacher who read erotic Latin poetry to her senior class. I didn’t have her, but friends did.

      • BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh man, I was in a kids choir when I was a kid and we performed at Christian churches often. I was raised Catholic and didn’t have access to a Bible routinely, we you bet I’d be reading Song of Solomon every chance I got. That is the horniest shit ever.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Until the picture is more clear, society should be mindful (not hysterical, mind you, just careful) about how to talk to children about this.

      Yes, we definitely should only teach children about proper, true, God-sanctioned heterosexual relationships until we know how to talk to children about two men holding hands.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Exactly how does it hurt kids to teach them that some people identify with a different gender than their biological sex? Do you have some psychological studies to back that claim up or are you just presuming you know?

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  A kid who thinks they’re heterosexual might start to imagine that they as well might identify with a different sexuality than the one they were born with, which can cause them significant stress.

                  Do you not see how this is the same?

                  And the reason the reporting of the number of cases has gone up is we’re more accepting of trans people now. Guess what, the number of LGBT+ people in general has gone up. Because people can come out of the closet without fearing for their life a lot of the time (but not every time) these days.

        • Poggervania@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Genders are a social construct, yes, but some people are literally born gay. It wasn’t like they chose to be gay - they just are. To say that sexuality is a “result of society” is absolutely ridiculous. To put this in perspective: can you, a straight guy, can just choose to be gay? Can you suddenly decide that you want to suck a dick? That’s how you know it’s not a social construct - you’re literally hard-wired to be whatever the fuck sexuality you are.

          I sort of get what you’re saying with heterosexuality being the “default” because it’s quite literally how the human race needs to reproduce, but please don’t go saying that people choose to be gay, because they do not.

          • Wergul@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I always feel like “Choose to not be gay” people

            1. Want to try sleeping with someone of their gender
            2. Decide to suppress their needs because of religion / societal pressure
            3. Say to themselves “I’m not gay because I married a women/man”
            4. Project this on to all people and say that gay people gave in to their desires while straight are strong and don’t

            They don’t realize not every man wants to suck dick.

            They don’t realize step 1 already makes them gay no matter their choices.

            • Ech@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              This feels like the “One drop of blood” test but for sexuality. Things exist on a spectrum. Gay isn’t just “not straight”. People aren’t gay just because they wondered about same-sex relationships.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You think being gay is just about sex? Is heterosexuality just about sex to you? If so, I feel bad for you not having any romance in your life.

          • Agent641@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Homosexuality is a myth made up by the clothing industry to sell all their pink fabric and peacock sunglasses

        • steakmeout@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Look, why not just come out of the closet. It’s clear from your post history that you are obsessed with thoughts of gay sex. Just admit what you are. It’s 2023. Think long and hard.

    • Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The point of this post is to point out that the argument of “teachers are corrupting kids into being gay by talking about it and having books with gay people”. The fact that most people are straight doesn’t factor into it at all, unless you mean that everybody is born straight, in which case you’re just wrong. Btw a useful thought experiment in general is to swap “gay” with left-handed. Would you ever say that being right-handed is the “default handedness”? Would you care if a teacher mentions being left-handed?

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you have a pretty loose definition of default, it’s easy to conclude that right-handedness is the default handedness. I wouldn’t be surprised if OP agreed with that idea.

        • Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right, but at that point “default” becomes a useless term. Elsewhere in the thread OP said they’d raise their kids “heterosexually” or smth, and if they’re consistent with wanting to raise their kids the “default” way, they’d also want to raise their kids right-handedly, as girls (because women make up slightly more than 50% of the population), in Mandarin, etc etc. Nobody’s entirely default.

          Sure, you could say that right-handed is the default. And? It doesn’t impact any other arguments.

          Going even further into extremes, over 99% of matter in the universe is helium or hydrogen. By that definition of default, helium and hydrogen are the default state of matter, and carbon-based lifeforms aren’t “supposed to” exist.

    • Solarius@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      default because of centuries of religion and culture ensuring anything other than heterosexuality was punished

    • SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And being composed of hydrogen and helium is the default for 99.9% of the entire universe, so why are you creating exceptions for carbon?

    • AnonTwo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s true

      But it also has nothing to do with this. It’s as good as saying someone is evil because the sky is blue.

        • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          He probably grossed himself out describing all that and is now in spiritual detox. I’m sure he will elaborate once the priest has exorcised all the evil spirits.

          Etcetera

      • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        59
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’d have to ask the OP. But some LGBT issues in schools include sexually explicit books and sexually explicit performances in public schools.

        • kase@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          Neither of those are LGBT+ issues, for the record. I know one or two of the stories you’re talking about, one that was a drag performance and another about a book with a same-sex relationship, but the issue with either of those had nothing to do with their connection to LGBT+ topics–at least it shouldn’t have been, but they were treated that way. They should’ve been handled just like anything else inappropriate in a school, but at large, the problem was treated as them being drag or having LGBT+ characters.

          There’s no need for legislation for this kind of thing because the same things that are inappropriate for queer people to do in schools are already inappropriate for cis/het people to do. I’m not saying that in disagreement with what you said, just pointing it out in addition.

          • HughJanus@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Neither of those are LGBT+ issues, for the record.

            One example was a book with illustrations of one dude giving another dude a blowjob, which falls squarely under G.

            Another one was a trans woman giving a lapdance to a junior high girl, which falls squarely under T.

            So, I’ll have to disagree.

            • JamesFire@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Except if you changed those situations so the acts were the same, but the people involved were all straight and cis, they’d still be a problem.

              Them being LGBT isn’t the problem. Them having NSFW content is, regardless of the specifics of that content, and the identities of the people involved.

    • pewter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t think what you’re saying is true. I know someone who very actively doesn’t want mentioning of gay people to kids. For context, he’s foreign-born, isn’t otherwise conservative, and has been a US citizen for probably longer than most people on Lemmy have been alive.

      I mention this anecdote because it’s part of many anecdotes and the vast majority of people in his community have viewpoints that I’ve heard and are much more extreme than his.

      • money_loo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And the person recording shouting it over what they’re actually saying just to make this video doesn’t ring any alarm bells for you? Really?