• bulgogi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Absent this data, smaller enterprises will lose a critical path to reach and attract new customers, and consumers overall will have less exposure to new products and services that may interest them,”

    Well the consumers who want that can stay opted into that privacy nightmare then

    • FigMcLargeHuge
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      many advertising companies have argued it would undermine their industry.

      This part is pretty laughable.

      • thrawn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fr. They always say that shit like everyone should care about their industry. Like nah b that only negatively affects you and whatever congressmen you bribe

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Oh nooo, the poor wittle advertising companies that always try to manipulate us into always buying more shit we don’t neeeed. Oh nooooes

        • FigMcLargeHuge
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right? How will they be able to afford naming rights to venues, etc. Imagine if advertisers like today had been around in ancient times. We would have things like The Great Samsung Wall, the Khufu.com Pyramids of Egypt, or Kentucky Fried Chichén Itzá. Advertising like we have now is literally a herpes on society and no tears will be shed by me if their industry is undermined.