“Why use 1 part when 6 will be more interesting.” Those engineers? I’m not saying they can’t, but I wouldn’t be putting money on it.
Right now we can’t do fission economically despite 70 years of trying, and it’s basically using hot sticks to boil water. Suspending plasma in a magnetic field to somehow boil water is a whole other level of complexity.
deleted by creator
Good thing fusion wouldn’t cause any of that, then
deleted by creator
Here’s the most basic info on fusion safety I could find: https://www.iaea.org/bulletin/safety-in-fusion
The conditions required to start and maintain a fusion reaction make a fission-type accident or nuclear meltdown based on a chain reaction impossible. Nuclear fusion power plants will require out-of-this-world conditions — temperatures exceeding 100 million degrees Celsius to achieve high enough particle density for the reaction to take place. As fusion reactions can only take place under such extreme conditions, a ‘runaway’ chain reaction is impossible
“Fusion is a self-limiting process: if you cannot control the reaction, the machine switches itself off,”
fusion does not produce highly radioactive, long lived nuclear waste.
deleted by creator
Would you care to share a single reputable source, or are these your own speculations on a technology that all the experts are saying is safe?
You are a moron.
Can you provide a reputable source for these claims? Otherwise I’ll delete the OG comment and its replies. There’s no point in leaving up misinformation.
